![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.flyfisherman.com/skills/jbleaders/
The above link (from the list that Mike posted in the "Dead Drift"thread) refers to Gary Borger's Uni-Leader designs. Has anyone ever tied some up and tried them? The design appeals to me because its simple (and even more importantly) it would cost me nothing because I already have the right leader material! g.c. Not that I'm cheap or anything... g.c. O.K. I *am* cheap. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Cleveland" wrote in message ... http://www.flyfisherman.com/skills/jbleaders/ The above link (from the list that Mike posted in the "Dead Drift"thread) refers to Gary Borger's Uni-Leader designs. Has anyone ever tied some up and tried them? The design appeals to me because its simple (and even more importantly) it would cost me nothing because I already have the right leader material! g.c. Not that I'm cheap or anything... g.c. O.K. I *am* cheap. Yeah, they work OK. If you use some other brands of nylon ( instead of maxima), you have to change some dimensions, but these are rarely very critical. TL MC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:10:02 +0200, "Mike Connor"
wrote: "George Cleveland" wrote in message .. . http://www.flyfisherman.com/skills/jbleaders/ The above link (from the list that Mike posted in the "Dead Drift"thread) refers to Gary Borger's Uni-Leader designs. Has anyone ever tied some up and tried them? The design appeals to me because its simple (and even more importantly) it would cost me nothing because I already have the right leader material! g.c. Not that I'm cheap or anything... g.c. O.K. I *am* cheap. Yeah, they work OK. If you use some other brands of nylon ( instead of maxima), you have to change some dimensions, but these are rarely very critical. TL MC Mike, by "O.K." do you mean as good as or better than knotless leaders? If they are only as good as knotless ones I won't bother expending the effort to whip some up. g.c. Not only cheap, but lazy too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Cleveland" wrote in message ... SNIP Mike, by "O.K." do you mean as good as or better than knotless leaders? If they are only as good as knotless ones I won't bother expending the effort to whip some up. g.c. Not only cheap, but lazy too. OK since you asked. In my opinion they are nowhere near as good or as convenient as good knotless tapered leaders. Given the choice, I would go for knotless leaders every time. I have a couple of mods for knotless leaders which make them far more useful to me. They also last me a lot longer, so the initial cost is not really a factor. Over the years, I have tried hundreds of things, some work alright, some are well nigh useless. In many cases, even trying them was really a waste of time, but I learned a lot as a result. I no longer bother experimenting much with leaders at all, as I can do everything I want with the modified knotless leaders. The modifications are quite simple as well. I use a needle knotted butt section directly on my line, if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter. I use a leader ring at the end of the knotless leader, as I can then change tippet, or droppers etc etc, with no fuss and bother, without shortening or otherwise damaging the leader, and very quickly, and without wasting nylon. This is also much more flexible in use than knotted leaders. Often, such a leader will last me a whole season, ( even when I fished a great deal). I merely change the tippet, droppers etc as required. With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides. I usually carry spares as well of course. But a total of six new knotless tapers would normally last me a whole season, and often a lot longer. Nylon deteriorates, but the weakest point in a leader is always the tippet, and I change this regularly. The function is what I require, all the rest may be nice, ( or not!), but usually superfluous. TL MC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Connor" wrote The modifications are quite simple as well. I use a needle knotted butt section directly on my line, if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter. I use a leader ring at the end of the knotless leader, as I can then change tippet, or droppers etc etc, with no fuss and bother, without shortening or otherwise damaging the leader, and very quickly, and without wasting nylon. This is also much more flexible in use than knotted leaders. Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? and you are nail knotting the correct one on as you change conditions/ techniques even if they change several times a day ? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"Mike Connor" wrote The modifications are quite simple as well. I use a needle knotted butt section directly on my line, if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter. I use a leader ring at the end of the knotless leader, as I can then change tippet, or droppers etc etc, with no fuss and bother, without shortening or otherwise damaging the leader, and very quickly, and without wasting nylon. This is also much more flexible in use than knotted leaders. Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? After reading your post, i realized the main feature I like better about hand tied leaders - the stiffer butt section. I've never tried it the way Mike describes it, but my guess is that I would like the tapered leader with butt section removed tied onto the stiffer butt section of Maxima Chameleon (I sometimes use 30 pound / .022 inch, but usually 25 pound / .020 inch). It's just that the blood knot machine is soooooo much fun, I can't stop! ;-) -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... SNIP Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? That is correct. Maxima leaders are pretty good though, I donīt usually have to change anything, I merely add a butt section, and a leader ring at the approriate length. Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g Leader ring = http://www.sportfish-flyfishing.co.u...Tyers_964.html In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? and you are nail knotting the correct one on as you change conditions/ techniques even if they change several times a day ? That is also correct. I modify the butts, and on the river I either change the leaders, or modify the tippets as required. Invariably the butts will not turn the leader over properly without modification, and the tippets are not always as one wishes. This is easy and quick to modify with the leader rings. One may also use "forcing butts", or build "slack line leaders" and the like, merely by adding the appropriate tippet to a previously modified leader. One has less knots than in a knotted leader ( Amazing that! ![]() also use any diameter tippet as required, to force extreme turnover, extreme drop, etc etc, merely by knotting the appropriate tippet to the ring. The knots are secure, as they are not nylon to nylon, but nylon to ring, and there is no need to observe the decreasing diameter rule ( Joining nylon of widely varying diameter with blood, and other knots, is unreliable at best). Really a very simple, versatile, effective, and cheap system. TL MC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"Mike Connor" wrote The modifications are quite simple as well. I use a needle knotted butt section directly on my line, if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter. I use a leader ring at the end of the knotless leader, as I can then change tippet, or droppers etc etc, with no fuss and bother, without shortening or otherwise damaging the leader, and very quickly, and without wasting nylon. This is also much more flexible in use than knotted leaders. Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? After reading your post, i realized the main feature I like better about hand tied leaders - the stiffer butt section. I've never tried it the way Mike describes it, but my guess is that I would like the tapered leader with butt section removed tied onto the stiffer butt section of Maxima Chameleon (I sometimes use 30 pound / .022 inch, but usually 25 pound / .020 inch). It's just that the blood knot machine is soooooo much fun, I can't stop! ;-) -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"Mike Connor" wrote The modifications are quite simple as well. I use a needle knotted butt section directly on my line, if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter. I use a leader ring at the end of the knotless leader, as I can then change tippet, or droppers etc etc, with no fuss and bother, without shortening or otherwise damaging the leader, and very quickly, and without wasting nylon. This is also much more flexible in use than knotted leaders. Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? After reading your post, i realized the main feature I like better about hand tied leaders - the stiffer butt section. I've never tried it the way Mike describes it, but my guess is that I would like the tapered leader with butt section removed tied onto the stiffer butt section of Maxima Chameleon (I sometimes use 30 pound / .022 inch, but usually 25 pound / .020 inch). It's just that the blood knot machine is soooooo much fun, I can't stop! ;-) -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... SNIP Mike, a couple questions/ comments I'm currently using mainly a section or two of maxima, as butt, tied to a tapered leader with it's butt removed ... I like stiffer butts than what I find on tapered leaders ... this sounds very much like your, " if necessary with two or more sections, to obtain the diameter and taper I require, as the knotless leader butt sections are usually of too small a diameter" ... is it" or am I reading your post incorrectly? If correct, then you are really using a kind of 1/2 hand tied leader, like myself, right? That is correct. Maxima leaders are pretty good though, I donīt usually have to change anything, I merely add a butt section, and a leader ring at the approriate length. Second ... the phrase "leader ring" is entirely new to me ..... what is this in American english ? g Leader ring = http://www.sportfish-flyfishing.co.u...Tyers_964.html In the previous, much diverted, loop thread I said I use loops, and I do not out of loopophilia, rather ... mainly because its the BUTT not the tippet that I feel the need to change to match different techniques and conditions. Again this sounds much like your, "With three knotless tapered leaders in different configurations, suitably modified, I can use practically any standard technique, and a few more besides " Are these three mainly BUTT differences? and you are nail knotting the correct one on as you change conditions/ techniques even if they change several times a day ? That is also correct. I modify the butts, and on the river I either change the leaders, or modify the tippets as required. Invariably the butts will not turn the leader over properly without modification, and the tippets are not always as one wishes. This is easy and quick to modify with the leader rings. One may also use "forcing butts", or build "slack line leaders" and the like, merely by adding the appropriate tippet to a previously modified leader. One has less knots than in a knotted leader ( Amazing that! ![]() also use any diameter tippet as required, to force extreme turnover, extreme drop, etc etc, merely by knotting the appropriate tippet to the ring. The knots are secure, as they are not nylon to nylon, but nylon to ring, and there is no need to observe the decreasing diameter rule ( Joining nylon of widely varying diameter with blood, and other knots, is unreliable at best). Really a very simple, versatile, effective, and cheap system. TL MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DIY: Furled leaders | Conan the Librarian | Fly Fishing | 11 | September 30th, 2004 12:09 AM |
stell leaders | cwoodring | Fly Fishing | 2 | August 11th, 2004 08:46 AM |
Leaders? | Tim Apple | Fly Fishing | 16 | August 2nd, 2004 07:08 AM |
Wall mart Leaders | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 11 | April 4th, 2004 06:35 AM |