![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen Epps wrote in message . ..
In article , riverman wrote: Hmm, off the top of my head, I'd say that the vehicles with higher towing capacity would almost certainly have lower fuel economy. Heavier frame, larger engine, lower gearing. Why, are you thinking that maybe US vehicles are designed more often to be set up for towing? I did some more research on the Nissan Pathfinder and the Nissan Terrano. I already knew that they were the same vehicle, but strangely enough you cannot get the 4-cylinder version in the US. You can get the V8 model on this side of the pond ('overseas' to all you residents of the United States of Canada), but its the 4-cylinder model that gets in excess of 30 mpg. Why won't they sell the more efficient model in the US? Not everyone wants to tow things around. --riverman I suspect for much the same reason that a manual transmission is not available on the new Ford F-150. It's not worth the engineering effort for the sales that it would bring. In the case of the 4 cyl that would be more economical Toyota says go buy the _____ whatever their small SUV or wagon is. The engineering is not simply making it fit but passing emissions, crash testing, training mechanics to work on it, establishing parts supply lines and such. Car companies work on some damn narrow margins and if it's not profitable they won't do it. Well, maybe British car companies would which explains why you don't see many Rover dealers over here anymore. As far as the diesels go there are some pretty strict limits on importation due to emissions (yea pick your poison, SO emission or particulates) but I think once low sulfur diesel is available in the US (mid 2006) we might see a bunch more TDI like vehicles. It's not just a matter of the fuel but the better fuel will allow for better emissions equipment to be installed. Current emissions tests require that they be done using the fuel available and with that current diesels don't generally pass the NOS test. Allen Forget about what will tow a trailer. Worry about what will STOP a trailer. Lou T |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen Epps wrote in message . ..
In article , riverman wrote: Hmm, off the top of my head, I'd say that the vehicles with higher towing capacity would almost certainly have lower fuel economy. Heavier frame, larger engine, lower gearing. Why, are you thinking that maybe US vehicles are designed more often to be set up for towing? I did some more research on the Nissan Pathfinder and the Nissan Terrano. I already knew that they were the same vehicle, but strangely enough you cannot get the 4-cylinder version in the US. You can get the V8 model on this side of the pond ('overseas' to all you residents of the United States of Canada), but its the 4-cylinder model that gets in excess of 30 mpg. Why won't they sell the more efficient model in the US? Not everyone wants to tow things around. --riverman I suspect for much the same reason that a manual transmission is not available on the new Ford F-150. It's not worth the engineering effort for the sales that it would bring. In the case of the 4 cyl that would be more economical Toyota says go buy the _____ whatever their small SUV or wagon is. The engineering is not simply making it fit but passing emissions, crash testing, training mechanics to work on it, establishing parts supply lines and such. Car companies work on some damn narrow margins and if it's not profitable they won't do it. Well, maybe British car companies would which explains why you don't see many Rover dealers over here anymore. As far as the diesels go there are some pretty strict limits on importation due to emissions (yea pick your poison, SO emission or particulates) but I think once low sulfur diesel is available in the US (mid 2006) we might see a bunch more TDI like vehicles. It's not just a matter of the fuel but the better fuel will allow for better emissions equipment to be installed. Current emissions tests require that they be done using the fuel available and with that current diesels don't generally pass the NOS test. Allen Forget about what will tow a trailer. Worry about what will STOP a trailer. Lou T |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A vehicle that slow would get you run over as try to enter the freeway around
here. Big Dale |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel Costs? | Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers | Bass Fishing | 9 | April 19th, 2004 06:26 PM |
Bright Green Thread | Jim | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | April 17th, 2004 05:02 AM |
I Need Thread!!!! | JWirth4702 | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | January 6th, 2004 12:17 AM |
Split Thread Technique | tyer | Fly Fishing Tying | 13 | November 26th, 2003 08:20 PM |
Life in Congo, Part V: What a (long) strange trip its being.... | riverman | Fly Fishing | 58 | September 25th, 2003 12:28 PM |