(nff) sierra steam and mountain (aka Tie-fast) telling fibs behind my back

The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?

wrote in message
oups.com...
The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?

Actually, I think what everybody who has responded here thus far is talking
about is that you are an annoying little wiener......or whiner.......however
you care to spell it. Personally, I disagree.......I think you're at least
as amusing as any of the regular dolts we get here.

Wolfgang
who is all adither waiting to see who disagrees.

Haven't been here in a while... is it just me, or are some roffians
subconsciously missing he-who-must-not-be-named? g

Scoobey

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:24:03 GMT, wrote:

Haven't been here in a while... is it just me, or are some roffians
subconsciously missing he-who-must-not-be-named? g

Geeze, he's barely left the building!

;-)

wrote:
The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or
are you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?

This gem:
-----------
Subject: Tie-Fast aka SIerra stream and mountain took care of me
Steve Sullivan Apr 6 2004, 9:41 am
They called me up today, I came in, and they gave me a new pair of
waders.
-----------
indicates they took care of you properly - in your own words. They even
took care of you despite the voided warranty from the manufacturer,
which is pretty damned sporting. Since you decided to smear their name
in every newsgroup and bulletin board to which you could post, they felt
it necessary to clear their name. I think you're a ridiculously obsessed
individual who rambles from one side of the issue to another and expects
everyone to be on your side. Long live Tie-Fast. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

On 6 Jan 2005 19:05:05 -0800, wrote:

The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?


Yeah. I didn't Google it, but it was weird enough to remember. The
facts of the damage were all different back then, as was the cause the
owner of the shop supposedly gave you for the damage.

Unless you're not the guy who claimed he got the waders in trade for
doing some work for the owner of the shop? But you certainly sound /
type like him.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: lid (strip the .invalid to email)

Cyli wrote:

On 6 Jan 2005 19:05:05 -0800, wrote:


The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?



Yeah. I didn't Google it, but it was weird enough to remember. The
facts of the damage were all different back then, as was the cause the
owner of the shop supposedly gave you for the damage.

Unless you're not the guy who claimed he got the waders in trade for
doing some work for the owner of the shop? But you certainly sound /
type like him.

Cyli

No telling what Steve was up to back then. He was trolling around here
for a while, under an alias. He's sent a vulgar(even by ROFF
standards)email to a woman, at another discussion group. That got him
band from the board. He's since posted under a new address, but that
went badly(to put it mildly)for him too. Just when I start to feel bad
for him, he does something like post what he did here.

I've received that email from the fly shop, and i've seen the pictures
of the waders in question. I doubt anyone, with any sense, would say
these waders were defective, or should be covered under warranty. The
rest of Steve's history with this fly shop, and his own actions on
several boards, just bolsters the fly shops assertions.

It's never Steve's fault. Shame on us!

brians,....well not you specifically, but us in general. :-)

Cyli wrote:

On 6 Jan 2005 19:05:05 -0800, wrote:


The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?



Yeah. I didn't Google it, but it was weird enough to remember. The
facts of the damage were all different back then, as was the cause the
owner of the shop supposedly gave you for the damage.

Unless you're not the guy who claimed he got the waders in trade for
doing some work for the owner of the shop? But you certainly sound /
type like him.

Cyli

No telling what Steve was up to back then. He was trolling around here
for a while, under an alias. He's sent a vulgar(even by ROFF
standards)email to a woman, at another discussion group. That got him
band from the board. He's since posted under a new address, but that
went badly(to put it mildly)for him too. Just when I start to feel bad
for him, he does something like post what he did here.

I've received that email from the fly shop, and i've seen the pictures
of the waders in question. I doubt anyone, with any sense, would say
these waders were defective, or should be covered under warranty. The
rest of Steve's history with this fly shop, and his own actions on
several boards, just bolsters the fly shops assertions.

It's never Steve's fault. Shame on us!

brians,....well not you specifically, but us in general. :-)

wrote in message
oups.com...
The only thing different I see in the two posts was back then I felt
like people should boycott tie-fast and now I feel differently. Or are
you talking about a FACT that is inconsistent?

Actually, I think what everybody who has responded here thus far is talking
about is that you are an annoying little wiener......or whiner.......however
you care to spell it. Personally, I disagree.......I think you're at least
as amusing as any of the regular dolts we get here.

Wolfgang
who is all adither waiting to see who disagrees.