![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Cook" wrote in message ... RW's posts are having a problem reaching me, too, so: In part this is what bothers me about all this: we sit around and moan about the mass extinction, but it doesn't stop us from getting the next latte at Starbucks. That's in part why I'm so dismissive of the issue. If we really believed it mattered, we'd change. John, get real it is not that "next latte at Starbucks" that is the problem. You are sounding like the "cut it all boys" whose snicker-logic says that your use of toilet paper is inconsistent with your opposition to their gang rape logging of the last 9% of the old growth. And its the "go along to get along" attitude of average Republicans to even the most destructive and disloyal policies of the extremists in control of the party of Lincoln, that is tearing this country apart. Dave |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Fri, 27 May 2005 12:59:01 -0700, "David Snedeker" wrote: Well, whatdayaknow! SARGE! Speak of the devil...no, that's not really fair, I suppose, but nobody really says "Speak of the crazy person," either. How are ya, you ol' loon, you? Eleven-and-a-half Eagles....Dick Im fine Richy. How are you? I see you are back and picken at the other kids again. Welcome back. And there is Wolf****weasel hounden ya like a stalker. Yep, its stalking, though he will deny it in a few weeks. And besides, it kinda confuses me. It makes it difficult to decide who, between the two of you, I'd get the most pleasure out of giving a verbal cuffing. Usually I can play "activist judge" and decide who "deserves" a good word wallop. But this time you are both so deserving. Lets see: Enny, Meanie, Miny, Moe. . . . Then again its a nice problem to have. Dave So little time, so many fools to cuff. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . ...Enny, Meanie, Miny, Moe. . . . Catch a Hebrew by the toe! Wolfgang cuff away, bad goy. ![]() |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . ...Enny, Meanie, Miny, Moe. . . . Catch a Hebrew by the toe! Wolfgang cuff away, bad goy. ![]() Actually it goes. . . "Catch an over-compensating Kraut-spawn by the toe." No, it doesn't. At least, that's not the way you learned it as a child........nor the way you use it today. However, it's interesting that you are willing (and apparently able) to put aside (if only for the moment) the hatreds you imbibed with your mother's milk (or somebody's, anyway) long enough to reaffirm your hatred for both Jews AND Germans! You might want to have a look at: http://www.holocaustchronicle.org/ some day when the Mossad leaves you alone long enough. But then, you might not get that. Maybe not. Why don't you explain it to me? Its kind of a Weekly Reader thang. Sorry, I ain't got much time for ephemera. Like "Peace Now" in Israel, another thangy that doesn't fit into your multitude of certitudes. Ah, here we go! THAT'S our Davie! ![]() Dave Who prefers Conybears over Havahearts. You should try a camel hair brush. Wolfgang who, battered but not beaten, thinks he might last one more round. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . ...Enny, Meanie, Miny, Moe. . . . Catch a Hebrew by the toe! Wolfgang cuff away, bad goy. ![]() Actually it goes. . . "Catch an over-compensating Kraut-spawn by the toe." But then, you might not get that. Its kind of a Weekly Reader thang. Like "Peace Now" in Israel, another thangy that doesn't fit into your multitude of certitudes. Dave Who prefers Conybears over Havahearts. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . "Joe Ellis" wrote in message ... In article , "Tim J." wrote: rw wrote: Tim J. wrote: rw wrote: snip snip In any case, your mother wears Army boots. Are you kidding? A liberal?? Make it Birkenstocks... Why is it that so many rear area sad-sacks think they have a monopoly on patriotism? Both Medal of Honor winners I have known are liberal Democrats. (I should say one is and one was . . . the second offed himself.) Hey, reminds me that that right-wing gay male prostitute the White House salted in the press corps. . . didn't his ad show that his specialty was giving golden showers while wearing boots and a USMC hat? What is it with right-wingers that so many of them are closet perverts, yet when they are sober they feel they have to preach to everybody else? Maybe if they stayed drunk they wouldn't have to feel so guilty? We've got one asshole here in Washington State like that right now in the press limelight. He's the former legislature leader who for years persecuted gays and pulled lots of other right-wing bull****. West is his name and he is now Mayor of Spokane. Well it turns out West has a history going back 30 years of kid raping and other disgusting ****. Turns out when he was a sheriff he was f- - - - - - little boys. Same when he was a boyscout leader etc. And people keep coming forward with new charges. I have no problem with him being gay (even after years of him leading the Republican homophobic charge); I do have a problem with his targeting young people. The most disgusting part is that it turns out that some of his right-wing Rebublicrat buddies kind of knew about his tricks. And did nothing. They ought to be horse whipped. I can go down the list and name other big mouth right-wingers who it turned out were adulteress, thieves and/or perverts. Will someone please explain to me how a party with so many of these kinds of leaders can claim some kind of higher moral authority? In the Democrat party they throw them out. But Republicans seem to protect and defend these rats. Why? Wow. You got a list? Wow. O.k., anybody who sincerely doubts that the boy is dangerous crazy, here's your chance to stand up and be counted. Wolfgang tailgunner joe rides again. wow. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Ellis" wrote in message ... In article , "Tim J." wrote: rw wrote: Tim J. wrote: rw wrote: snip snip In any case, your mother wears Army boots. Are you kidding? A liberal?? Make it Birkenstocks... Why is it that so many rear area sad-sacks think they have a monopoly on patriotism? Both Medal of Honor winners I have known are liberal Democrats. (I should say one is and one was . . . the second offed himself.) Hey, reminds me that that right-wing gay male prostitute the White House salted in the press corps. . . didn't his ad show that his specialty was giving golden showers while wearing boots and a USMC hat? What is it with right-wingers that so many of them are closet perverts, yet when they are sober they feel they have to preach to everybody else? Maybe if they stayed drunk they wouldn't have to feel so guilty? We've got one asshole here in Washington State like that right now in the press limelight. He's the former legislature leader who for years persecuted gays and pulled lots of other right-wing bull****. West is his name and he is now Mayor of Spokane. Well it turns out West has a history going back 30 years of kid raping and other disgusting ****. Turns out when he was a sheriff he was f- - - - - - little boys. Same when he was a boyscout leader etc. And people keep coming forward with new charges. I have no problem with him being gay (even after years of him leading the Republican homophobic charge); I do have a problem with his targeting young people. The most disgusting part is that it turns out that some of his right-wing Rebublicrat buddies kind of knew about his tricks. And did nothing. They ought to be horse whipped. I can go down the list and name other big mouth right-wingers who it turned out were adulteress, thieves and/or perverts. Will someone please explain to me how a party with so many of these kinds of leaders can claim some kind of higher moral authority? In the Democrat party they throw them out. But Republicans seem to protect and defend these rats. Why? Dave |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Wolfgang" wrote: "David Snedeker" wrote in message .. . "Joe Ellis" wrote in message ... In article , "Tim J." wrote: rw wrote: Tim J. wrote: rw wrote: snip snip In any case, your mother wears Army boots. Are you kidding? A liberal?? Make it Birkenstocks... Why is it that so many rear area sad-sacks think they have a monopoly on patriotism? Both Medal of Honor winners I have known are liberal Democrats. (I should say one is and one was . . . the second offed himself.) Hey, reminds me that that right-wing gay male prostitute the White House salted in the press corps. . . didn't his ad show that his specialty was giving golden showers while wearing boots and a USMC hat? What is it with right-wingers that so many of them are closet perverts, yet when they are sober they feel they have to preach to everybody else? Maybe if they stayed drunk they wouldn't have to feel so guilty? We've got one asshole here in Washington State like that right now in the press limelight. He's the former legislature leader who for years persecuted gays and pulled lots of other right-wing bull****. West is his name and he is now Mayor of Spokane. Well it turns out West has a history going back 30 years of kid raping and other disgusting ****. Turns out when he was a sheriff he was f- - - - - - little boys. Same when he was a boyscout leader etc. And people keep coming forward with new charges. I have no problem with him being gay (even after years of him leading the Republican homophobic charge); I do have a problem with his targeting young people. The most disgusting part is that it turns out that some of his right-wing Rebublicrat buddies kind of knew about his tricks. And did nothing. They ought to be horse whipped. I can go down the list and name other big mouth right-wingers who it turned out were adulteress, thieves and/or perverts. Will someone please explain to me how a party with so many of these kinds of leaders can claim some kind of higher moral authority? In the Democrat party they throw them out. But Republicans seem to protect and defend these rats. Why? Wow. You got a list? Wow. O.k., anybody who sincerely doubts that the boy is dangerous crazy, here's your chance to stand up and be counted. Wolfgang tailgunner joe rides again. wow. snicker And this time he's a leftie... -- "What it all comes to is that the whole structure of space flight as it stands now is creaking, obsolecent, over-elaborate, decaying. The field is static; no, worse than that, it's losing ground. By this time, our ships ought to be sleeker and faster, and able to carry bigger payloads. We ought to have done away with this dichotomy between ships that can land on a planet, and ships that can fly from one planet to another." - Senator Bliss Wagoner James Blish - _They Shall Have Stars_ |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Snedeker wrote:
I can go down the list and name other big mouth right-wingers who it turned out were adulteress, thieves and/or perverts. Will someone please explain to me how a party with so many of these kinds of leaders can claim some kind of higher moral authority? In the Democrat party they throw them out. But Republicans seem to protect and defend these rats. Why? Ask Rush, the thrice married and thrice divorced drug addict, or Bill Bennett, the "Book of Virtues" morality scold who lost $8 million gambling, or Bill O'Reilly, the right-wing media guy who had to settle out of court on a truly obscene and bizarre sexual harassment lawsuit. The list goes on. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "rw" wrote in message m... ...The list goes on. Uh oh. Could someone please start keeping a list of the lists......and send it to, Wolfgang who is beginning to lose track? thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|