2008 Presidential election about race?

Tom Littleton wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
Bull**** is fine, racist bull**** is not. I try to be careful and
call the bull**** racist, not the people.

and calling an alternative opinion, or reading of statistics, racist is
wrong. Repeating it, endlessly, at nearly everyone who questions your
statistical analysis, is loony.

Assuming that most or a significant number of black voters are
black racists is racist bull****.

It doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with "statistical analysis".
There's nothing wrong with calling racist bull**** exactly what
it is. And I fully intend to do just that.

YMMV

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wroterant and likely to stay that way.

If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist when
they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

I posted a link that, I believe, conclusively shows white racism in the
deep South. Should anyone be surprised by that? No, they shouldn't.

As long as the Republicans stick to their "southern strategy" and court
these angry, racist whites, the worse off they'll be.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Actually, my conclusion is that your "Washington penance" was
spent sleeping in a cardboard box behind the Treasury Department.
But I thought I'd be generous, go with the benefit of the doubt
and give you a suitable job.

And I am free to draw whatever conclusions I want about chicken****
anonymous posters.

Like the insight provided by Mr. Littleton... looney

Uh huh. Like the insight provided by common sense, you're
anonymous, ignorant and likely to stay that way.

If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.


I didn't post racist bull****, just statistics.

Get some help. Seriously. Get help.

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Uh huh. Like the insight provided by common sense, you're
anonymous, ignorant and likely to stay that way.

If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

I didn't post racist bull****, just statistics.

The implicit assumption that there is some sort of equivalence
(the sword cuts both ways, you said) between the overwhelming
majority of blacks voting for Obama because he was the better
candidate and racist rednecks in the deep south voting against
Obama because he's black is not statistics, it's racist bull****.
And that is exactly what you posted. You're an ignorant person.
Seriously.

--
Ken Fortenberry

rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist when
they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

Well, in the first place I didn't call the anonymous janitor a
racist, I called his post racist bull****. And if it wasn't
OBVIOUSLY racist bull**** to you, then bless your heart, you're
one of those oblivious types.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist when
they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

Well, in the first place I didn't call the anonymous janitor a
racist, I called his post racist bull****. And if it wasn't
OBVIOUSLY racist bull**** to you, then bless your heart, you're
one of those oblivious types.


Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist when
they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

Well, in the first place I didn't call the anonymous janitor a
racist, I called his post racist bull****. And if it wasn't
OBVIOUSLY racist bull**** to you, then bless your heart, you're
one of those oblivious types.

Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist
when they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

Well, in the first place I didn't call the anonymous janitor a
racist, I called his post racist bull****. And if it wasn't
OBVIOUSLY racist bull**** to you, then bless your heart, you're
one of those oblivious types.

Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.


*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

How cool is *that* ?!!? I append that one to every single post !

Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

How cool is *that* ?!!? I append that one to every single post !

Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !



Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.

Yeah, "Fortenberry". I can think of no more insulting description.

Go ahead and post. You'll get the last word, but I won't pay any
attention to it. You're obviously not worth the bandwidth. But maybe
you should mention to your shrink that he should up your meds.