![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote
How do you figure? Well ... I was kinda bein cutsie (hence the smiley) ... but the clause itself can be viewed as a "law respecting an establishment of religion" |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fiddleaway wrote:
rw wrote How do you figure? Well ... I was kinda bein cutsie (hence the smiley) ... but the clause itself can be viewed as a "law respecting an establishment of religion" I still don't get it. Never mind. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang wrote:
"Joe Smith" wrote in message . .. Wolfgang wrote: "Joe Smith" wrote in message om... Wolfgang wrote: "Joe Smith" wrote in message ... I believe that RDean and Ken, while abusive, do actually believe what they spout. That's pretty funny. Kennie doesn't believe in anything......and dicklet doesn't say anything. While I disagree with most of what each of them say, And who do you suppose gives a ****? Oh wow, 20 questions. Looks like just one to me......but then, I'm not a good reader. That's the second step to recovery, admitting that you have a problem. I do, I do. Well, that makes roughly two of you. And he can count. it's obvious that they believe what they say. Kennie doesn't believe in anything.......and dicklet doesn't say anything. Show me where I said that did. Show me where I said that you said that did. You did. Sticks and stones my little pretty. True enough......but it doesn't make you any less a dumbass, does it? Makes you more of one though. I'd hate to have to put up with you in real life. You'd hate it more than you can possibly guess. On that we agree. On this board, you're just a pitiful little person. Yeah, not the sort of thing you'd bother with.......right? Oh don't oversell yourself. You're no bother. I've dealt with worse trolls than you. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Smith wrote:
Oh don't oversell yourself. You're no bother. I've dealt with worse trolls than you. Wolfgang isn't a troll. He's an institution. :-) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:41:41 -0600, "Fiddleaway"
wrote: rw wrote How do you figure? Well ... I was kinda bein cutsie (hence the smiley) ... but the clause itself can be viewed as a "law respecting an establishment of religion" No, it can't. "Congress" didn't "make" the Bill of Rights in the sense contemplated by the Amendment, it proposed it to the legislatures of the States. But in any case, the Bill of Rights (the 1st ten amendments) is/are not law(s), it/they is/are a bar against Federal (and now, as decided by the SCOTUS, State and local) action that the law promulgated must follow, not laws made that citizens must follow. And a close study of what the SC has popped as prohibited by the 1st will show that, for the most part, they've been right, but it's not their job to consult with a State's legislature while they draft law, it is, generally speaking, their job to tell them when they've done it improperly. HTH, R |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
Joe Smith wrote: Oh don't oversell yourself. You're no bother. I've dealt with worse trolls than you. Wolfgang isn't a troll. He's an institution. :-) Or at the very least should be in one. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Knight" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... By the way, did you call me yesterday?......or did I have a really odd fever induced dream? ![]() Yup, I called. Whew! I was asleep again seconds after you called. Woke up about an hour later and had forgotten about it completely. Stumbled about the house for a few hours and then crashed again. Just as I was falling asleep around 9:30 I thought I heard the phone ring. Sat bolt upright in bed, said "huh?.....Wayne?" and collapsed again. Woke up in the morning and didn't remember any of it. Hm......come to think of it, this must all have been Friday, not yesterday. Yesterday was kind of foggy too, though. Last night, with a steely determination born of desparation, I even tried what my Romanian/Californian friend calls the "hat cure". You lie in bed on your back with a hat perched on one foot (he didn't specify which foot......I don't think it matters) and then drink whiskey till you see two hats. Didn't have any whiskey. Used red wine. Didn't work......ran out of wine. ![]() So, like, I got the ****in' plague ain't enough!......Becky hauls my still feverish ass out of bed at 7:00 this morning and says "Come on. You're going to yoga with me!" "huh?......yoga?" quoth I, rather wittily (I think) considering the circumstances. "It's good for you." Well.....yeah.....I guess.....sit on a mat, do a little deep breathing....meditate....chant....whatever.....can 't hurt, I s'pose. Sweet merciful Christ, they like ta ****in' killed me! I got twisted....I got stretched....I got pummeled! I did down dogs, up dogs, warrior stances, crows, pigeons and whatnot all animals. "Turn your head." she says. "Like this?" sez I. "No, like THIS!" "AAAAAAAAAHHH! AAAAAAAAHHHH! AAAAAAAAHHH!" "Now, look down." "Down? Um.....what are those bumps?" "Those are your vertebrae." "Vertebrae? AAAAAAAAAHHH! AAAAAAAAHHH! AAAAAAAHHH!" "Oh, stop being silly!" "Silly? Where's my left leg?" "Right there!" "Th.....? AAAAAAAHHH! AAAAAAAAAHHH! AAAAAAAAHHH! I escaped......eventually......well, most of me. Anyway, it all came back in a flash.....um.....well, o.k., sort of a dull fizz to be more precise.....when I saw your name on the screen this morning. I owe you half a lunch. Fat lot of good it's gonna do me. I think the perky little Nazi torturer/instructor sent my intestines out to be laundered or something......I don't know.....all day I've been afraid to look down there. ![]() Wolfgang |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Smith" wrote in message ... Wolfgang wrote: That's the second step to recovery, admitting that you have a problem. Problem? I do, I do. Well, that makes roughly two of you. And he can count. I'm actually pretty good at it. it's obvious that they believe what they say. Kennie doesn't believe in anything.......and dicklet doesn't say anything. Show me where I said that did. Show me where I said that you said that did. You did. Did what? Sticks and stones my little pretty. True enough......but it doesn't make you any less a dumbass, does it? Makes you more of one though. And? I'd hate to have to put up with you in real life. You'd hate it more than you can possibly guess. On that we agree. Yep. Absolutely. ![]() On this board, you're just a pitiful little person. Yeah, not the sort of thing you'd bother with.......right? Oh don't oversell yourself. You're no bother. I've dealt with worse trolls than you. Worse? Yet, somehow, I managed to lure you not only into this thread, but another as well........and without posting a single word. Wolfgang it went whi.......um......well, you know. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:41:41 -0600, "Fiddleaway" wrote: rw wrote How do you figure? Well ... I was kinda bein cutsie (hence the smiley) ... but the clause itself can be viewed as a "law respecting an establishment of religion" No, it can't. "Congress" didn't "make" the Bill of Rights in the sense contemplated by the Amendment, it proposed it to the legislatures of the States. But in any case, the Bill of Rights (the 1st ten amendments) is/are not law(s), it/they is/are a bar against Federal (and now, as decided by the SCOTUS, State and local) action that the law promulgated must follow, not laws made that citizens must follow. And a close study of what the SC has popped as prohibited by the 1st will show that, for the most part, they've been right, but it's not their job to consult with a State's legislature while they draft law, it is, generally speaking, their job to tell them when they've done it improperly. Good God, you are dim. Wolfgang who would bet a shiny new nickel that the boy gets a flaming bag of **** on his porch every day.......with mind numbingly predictable results. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang wrote:
"Joe Smith" wrote in message . .. rw wrote: Joe Smith wrote: Oh don't oversell yourself. You're no bother. I've dealt with worse trolls than you. Wolfgang isn't a troll. He's an institution. :-) Or at the very least should be in one. Comic genius. Wolfgang how DO they do it? When you've got funny material, it just writes itself. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'm Thinking Of Getting Back Into Fishing | Phil | UK Coarse Fishing | 3 | February 2nd, 2006 02:21 AM |
Thinking | Frank Reid | Fly Fishing | 14 | November 30th, 2005 02:02 AM |
Conventional Thinking | Chris Rennert | Bass Fishing | 4 | April 26th, 2005 06:33 AM |
FS: 15 years worth of tying materials | wch | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | April 16th, 2004 09:18 AM |
Worth Fishing this weekend? | G. M. Zimmermann | Bass Fishing | 2 | March 11th, 2004 11:41 PM |