![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my understanding its illegal for a private party to post public land NO
HUNTING or public water NO FISHING in Arizona. In fact, I when I used to hunt and trap for months at a time through the winter I recall see state lease grazing land post as no tresspassing except for the purpose of legally harvesting wildlife. Wording varied, but basically if you had a hunting, trapping, or fishing license and were engage in that activity you could enter the area. I recall farmers trying to post state lease land against hunters and being told by Az Game & Fish to remove the signs. Basically a governement agency with direct jurisdiction can post land or water, and other regulaions may limit the ability to hunt or fish such as not being allowed to hunt within a certain distance of an occupied building. However any other private closure of public land or water to hunting or fishing requires a commission special order from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Then it is supposed to be posted as POST NO (HUNTING/FISHING) BY COMMISSION ORDER #XXXXXXXX. When I was up at Lake Havasu over the weekend I noticed a couple privately owned marinas had posted signs like one I saw at Havasu Springs that say ABSOLUTEY NO FISHING FROM DOCK OR IN HARBOR. No commission order indicated. Now its my understanding that they own the docks and can legally post them as no fishing from dock, but that they don't own the water. Its still public water. Does anybody know if I understand the statutes correctly and/or if they actually do have a commission order to post those waters as off limits to fishing? -- Bob La Londe Cheapskate's Ways to Do Fishing Stuff (The Frugal Fisherman) Through the Month of October 2005 http://www.YumaBassMan.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... In my understanding its illegal for a private party to post public land NO HUNTING or public water NO FISHING in Arizona. In fact, I when I used to hunt and trap for months at a time through the winter I recall see state lease grazing land post as no tresspassing except for the purpose of legally harvesting wildlife. Wording varied, but basically if you had a hunting, trapping, or fishing license and were engage in that activity you could enter the area. I recall farmers trying to post state lease land against hunters and being told by Az Game & Fish to remove the signs. Basically a governement agency with direct jurisdiction can post land or water, and other regulaions may limit the ability to hunt or fish such as not being allowed to hunt within a certain distance of an occupied building. However any other private closure of public land or water to hunting or fishing requires a commission special order from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Then it is supposed to be posted as POST NO (HUNTING/FISHING) BY COMMISSION ORDER #XXXXXXXX. When I was up at Lake Havasu over the weekend I noticed a couple privately owned marinas had posted signs like one I saw at Havasu Springs that say ABSOLUTEY NO FISHING FROM DOCK OR IN HARBOR. No commission order indicated. Now its my understanding that they own the docks and can legally post them as no fishing from dock, but that they don't own the water. Its still public water. Does anybody know if I understand the statutes correctly and/or if they actually do have a commission order to post those waters as off limits to fishing? I also recall when I launched my boat at Lake Havasu State Park (Windsor Beach) the only signs around the docks and launch area indicated you could not fish from the docks, and that was it. -- Bob La Londe Cheapskate's Ways to Do Fishing Stuff (The Frugal Fisherman) Through the Month of October 2005 http://www.YumaBassMan.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... In my understanding its illegal for a private party to post public land NO HUNTING or public water NO FISHING in Arizona. In fact, I when I used to hunt and trap for months at a time through the winter I recall see state lease grazing land post as no tresspassing except for the purpose of legally harvesting wildlife. Wording varied, but basically if you had a hunting, trapping, or fishing license and were engage in that activity you could enter the area. I recall farmers trying to post state lease land against hunters and being told by Az Game & Fish to remove the signs. Basically a governement agency with direct jurisdiction can post land or water, and other regulaions may limit the ability to hunt or fish such as not being allowed to hunt within a certain distance of an occupied building. However any other private closure of public land or water to hunting or fishing requires a commission special order from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Then it is supposed to be posted as POST NO (HUNTING/FISHING) BY COMMISSION ORDER #XXXXXXXX. When I was up at Lake Havasu over the weekend I noticed a couple privately owned marinas had posted signs like one I saw at Havasu Springs that say ABSOLUTEY NO FISHING FROM DOCK OR IN HARBOR. No commission order indicated. Now its my understanding that they own the docks and can legally post them as no fishing from dock, but that they don't own the water. Its still public water. Does anybody know if I understand the statutes correctly and/or if they actually do have a commission order to post those waters as off limits to fishing? If I were you, I'd pose the same question to one of your local fish and game people, they would know the statutes pertinant to your state. Trusting the information received over the internet is a sure way to find yourself in hot water. To me, your line of thinking makes perfect sense, but I don't make the rules in Arizona. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in
message ... "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... In my understanding its illegal for a private party to post public land NO HUNTING or public water NO FISHING in Arizona. In fact, I when I used to hunt and trap for months at a time through the winter I recall see state lease grazing land post as no tresspassing except for the purpose of legally harvesting wildlife. Wording varied, but basically if you had a hunting, trapping, or fishing license and were engage in that activity you could enter the area. I recall farmers trying to post state lease land against hunters and being told by Az Game & Fish to remove the signs. Basically a governement agency with direct jurisdiction can post land or water, and other regulaions may limit the ability to hunt or fish such as not being allowed to hunt within a certain distance of an occupied building. However any other private closure of public land or water to hunting or fishing requires a commission special order from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Then it is supposed to be posted as POST NO (HUNTING/FISHING) BY COMMISSION ORDER #XXXXXXXX. When I was up at Lake Havasu over the weekend I noticed a couple privately owned marinas had posted signs like one I saw at Havasu Springs that say ABSOLUTEY NO FISHING FROM DOCK OR IN HARBOR. No commission order indicated. Now its my understanding that they own the docks and can legally post them as no fishing from dock, but that they don't own the water. Its still public water. Does anybody know if I understand the statutes correctly and/or if they actually do have a commission order to post those waters as off limits to fishing? If I were you, I'd pose the same question to one of your local fish and game people, they would know the statutes pertinant to your state. Trusting the information received over the internet is a sure way to find yourself in hot water. To me, your line of thinking makes perfect sense, but I don't make the rules in Arizona. I have e-mails into Az G&F as well as the state attorney's office. Being Columbus day I am sure they are all off fishing. -- Bob La Londe www.YumaBassMan.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Answer From Brad Jacobson
Region IV Fish Program Manager Arizona Game & Fish ************ You are correct in that the docks are private property and can be closed to fishing from them. As for the water, it is public water and can only be closed by going through the Arizona Game & Fish Commission. I am not aware of any such closure granted by the Commission. If you have any additional questions don't hesitate to contact me. Brad Jacobson Fish Program Manager Region IV -- Yuma 9140 E. 28th St. Yuma, AZ 85365 Phone # (928)342-0091 FAX # (928) 343-0730 ************ "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... In my understanding its illegal for a private party to post public land NO HUNTING or public water NO FISHING in Arizona. In fact, I when I used to hunt and trap for months at a time through the winter I recall see state lease grazing land post as no tresspassing except for the purpose of legally harvesting wildlife. Wording varied, but basically if you had a hunting, trapping, or fishing license and were engage in that activity you could enter the area. I recall farmers trying to post state lease land against hunters and being told by Az Game & Fish to remove the signs. Basically a governement agency with direct jurisdiction can post land or water, and other regulaions may limit the ability to hunt or fish such as not being allowed to hunt within a certain distance of an occupied building. However any other private closure of public land or water to hunting or fishing requires a commission special order from the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Then it is supposed to be posted as POST NO (HUNTING/FISHING) BY COMMISSION ORDER #XXXXXXXX. When I was up at Lake Havasu over the weekend I noticed a couple privately owned marinas had posted signs like one I saw at Havasu Springs that say ABSOLUTEY NO FISHING FROM DOCK OR IN HARBOR. No commission order indicated. Now its my understanding that they own the docks and can legally post them as no fishing from dock, but that they don't own the water. Its still public water. Does anybody know if I understand the statutes correctly and/or if they actually do have a commission order to post those waters as off limits to fishing? -- Bob La Londe Cheapskate's Ways to Do Fishing Stuff (The Frugal Fisherman) Through the Month of October 2005 http://www.YumaBassMan.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob La Londe" wrote in message ... Answer From Brad Jacobson Region IV Fish Program Manager Arizona Game & Fish ************ You are correct in that the docks are private property and can be closed to fishing from them. As for the water, it is public water and can only be closed by going through the Arizona Game & Fish Commission. I am not aware of any such closure granted by the Commission. If you have any additional questions don't hesitate to contact me. Brad Jacobson Fish Program Manager Region IV -- Yuma 9140 E. 28th St. Yuma, AZ 85365 Phone # (928)342-0091 FAX # (928) 343-0730 If I were you Bob, I would print this out and keep it with you, then fish the snot out of those docks. When someone complains, give them a copy and tell them to take it up with Brad. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in
: If I were you Bob, I would print this out and keep it with you, then fish the snot out of those docks. When someone complains, give them a copy and tell them to take it up with Brad. -- There are a few different degrees of "right", and a number of approaches you can take when you are. For example, if the private marinas let fishermen park at their facilities, or provide a ramp, or have a clubhouse willing to sell you a nonmember a beer when you get off the water, or anything like that that is an act of kindness for the community that doesn't cost anybody anything, you need to think about whether antagonizing the facility means that they'll tell all the fishermen to go to hell, and yank any of those perks. The coupla fish you might take off of their docks might not be worth coming off of the water and finding a boot on your wheel, or a screwdriver through your sidewall, or finding a locked gate the next time you try to park there. It's a little like landowners who don't post during hunting season. The minute one or two hunters annoy them, they'll post, and those few hunters may have ruined an opportunity for many hunters. Of coarse, this is a little different, because the marinas don't own the water. If they don't provide any of these little perks, and they aren't friendly with the community, have yourself a field day fishing their dock. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in : If I were you Bob, I would print this out and keep it with you, then fish the snot out of those docks. When someone complains, give them a copy and tell them to take it up with Brad. -- There are a few different degrees of "right", and a number of approaches you can take when you are. For example, if the private marinas let fishermen park at their facilities, or provide a ramp, or have a clubhouse willing to sell you a nonmember a beer when you get off the water, or anything like that that is an act of kindness for the community that doesn't cost anybody anything, you need to think about whether antagonizing the facility means that they'll tell all the fishermen to go to hell, and yank any of those perks. The coupla fish you might take off of their docks might not be worth coming off of the water and finding a boot on your wheel, or a screwdriver through your sidewall, or finding a locked gate the next time you try to park there. It's a little like landowners who don't post during hunting season. The minute one or two hunters annoy them, they'll post, and those few hunters may have ruined an opportunity for many hunters. Of coarse, this is a little different, because the marinas don't own the water. If they don't provide any of these little perks, and they aren't friendly with the community, have yourself a field day fishing their dock. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Actually in these cases we aren't talking about private clubs. We are talking about Marinas that provide services open to the public, but are privately owned. ie they sell gas, want you to come up to their store and buy sodas, and really like people who come up to the restaurant for dinner or lunch. As to perks they charge for using their ramps, and offer no perks for free that I am aware of. They of course allow you to park if you are eating at their restaurant and giving them your money. They are for profit businesses which are trying to lay claim to public resources for their own personal gain. I do appreciate your opinion, and if we were talking about a private yacht club marina that provided a service for others or offered something that wasn't specifically designed to put money in their own pockets I might be inclined to be more agreeable on the subject. Since they are a for profit that is profitting off the publicly owned resource I feel that attempting to claim more than is theirs to claim is in poor taste at best. Its actually illegal in my opinion, and I'm not even sure why they are allowed to keep the signs up as written. In other instances G&F and the state have forced people to remove illegal signs on public land or public water. -- Bob La Londe Cheapskate's Ways to Do Fishing Stuff (The Frugal Fisherman) Through the Month of October 2005 http://www.YumaBassMan.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob La Londe" wrote in
: I do appreciate your opinion, and if we were talking about a private yacht club marina that provided a service for others or offered something that wasn't specifically designed to put money in their own pockets I might be inclined to be more agreeable on the subject. No real disagreement. I didn't know the type of place you were talking about, just pointed out that there are a few ways to going about things. Since they are a for profit that is profitting off the publicly owned resource I feel that attempting to claim more than is theirs to claim is in poor taste at best. Its actually illegal in my opinion, and I'm not even sure why they are allowed to keep the signs up as written. In other instances G&F and the state have forced people to remove illegal signs on public land or public water. I'd work through F&G to make them take down the signs, especially if I used their ramp and was parked in their lot. I wouldn't force a personal showdown. The actual post I was replying to was recommending just fishing the water, and handing them a copy of a note saying that it wasn't posted for no fishing when they told you to move on. Again, it might be right, but I'm not sure you'd feel very satisfied being in the right as you were calling AAA to deal with your four flats-- that's the real point I was trying to make. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Seidman" wrote in message SNIP I'd work through F&G to make them take down the signs, especially if I used their ramp and was parked in their lot. I wouldn't force a personal showdown. The actual post I was replying to was recommending just fishing the water, and handing them a copy of a note saying that it wasn't posted for no fishing when they told you to move on. Again, it might be right, but I'm not sure you'd feel very satisfied being in the right as you were calling AAA to deal with your four flats-- that's the real point I was trying to make. Scott, Anyone that knows me well knows that normally I am a polite and decent person, but I've dealt with this type of mentality before. Trust me when I say that it's just about the only way that it can be handled. -- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to Fishing? | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 2nd, 2004 11:24 AM |
Arizona Fly Fishing | Fishing Arizona | Fly Fishing | 4 | September 15th, 2004 07:14 AM |
RECIPROCAL FISHING GOES INTO EFFECT ON LAKE CHAMPLAIN | Outdoors Magazine | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 29th, 2003 03:18 PM |
TR for the Bighorn Micro Clave and a Trip to Chas's | Warren | Fly Fishing | 102 | September 29th, 2003 03:19 PM |