![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman.
It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lionel F. Stevenson wrote:
I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html Looks like a Gordian knot to me. Chuck Vance |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel I think you are referring to the turle knot... http://www.flyfishingconnection.com/doubleturtle.html JT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel I call it "way more complicated than it needs to be". Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel No idea what this is. However, it looks mighty peculiar. According to the illustration, the line passes through the eye of the hook from left to right and then makes a sweeping bend back to the left. The rest of the gyrations cause the working end to cross the original running line a total of five times, but ALL of these crosses occur above the running line.....NONE of them below. The net result of this is that the original bend is not involved in the knot in any way. The knot.....whatever it may be called and whatever use it may allegedly serve.....appears to be nothing more than a large and needlessly complicated stopper. Wolfgang |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel No idea what this is. However, it looks mighty peculiar. According to the illustration, the line passes through the eye of the hook from left to right and then makes a sweeping bend back to the left. The rest of the gyrations cause the working end to cross the original running line a total of five times, but ALL of these crosses occur above the running line.....NONE of them below. The net result of this is that the original bend is not involved in the knot in any way. The knot.....whatever it may be called and whatever use it may allegedly serve.....appears to be nothing more than a large and needlessly complicated stopper. Wolfgang It looks to me the hook should be on the right side of the loop (knot) instead of on the left?, as I was looking at the diagram. -tom |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang typed:
"Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel No idea what this is. However, it looks mighty peculiar. . . That's because *I* developed it years ago: http://css.sbcma.com/timj/pics/knot.jpg -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang wrote:
"Lionel F. Stevenson" wrote in message ... I haven't seen this knot anywhere. It was shown to me by a Salmon fisherman. It is tied so the knot is on the underside of a down turned eye, and on the top of an upturned eye. http://www.cameraart.ca/knot.html -- Lionel No idea what this is. However, it looks mighty peculiar. According to the illustration, the line passes through the eye of the hook from left to right and then makes a sweeping bend back to the left. The rest of the gyrations cause the working end to cross the original running line a total of five times, but ALL of these crosses occur above the running line.....NONE of them below. The net result of this is that the original bend is not involved in the knot in any way. The knot.....whatever it may be called and whatever use it may allegedly serve.....appears to be nothing more than a large and needlessly complicated stopper. Like Jeff Taylor posted, it's a double turle, but it's very poorly illustrated. Jeff posted a better link, and here's another. http://www.pechetruite.com/Noeuds/hook6.htm It's not a "stopper." The knot forms a loop (two loops, actually) that secures to the shank of the hook just behind the eye. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Nakashima" wrote in message ... It looks to me the hook should be on the right side of the loop (knot) instead of on the left?, as I was looking at the diagram. Given that the bend is uninvolved in the knot, it wouldn't make any difference. Imagine this lying flat on a table. Placing the point of a pencil anywhere inside the snarl of loops and pushing it away from you would make the whole mess slide off of the running line between the hook and the bend at the right. In other words, you could indeed place the hook on the right, but it would be easy to do that as things stand in the picture by simply sliding it over.....nothing would be disturbed in the process. The knot (if knot it actually is.....I haven't looked closely enough to be sure) is the mass of coils in the center, between the hook and the bend. The bend itself CANNOT be a part of the knot as it is pictured. Wolfgang |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim J." wrote... No idea what this is. However, it looks mighty peculiar. . . That's because *I* developed it years ago: http://css.sbcma.com/timj/pics/knot.jpg -- TL, Tim LOL... Looks like my initial attempts at nailknots, Albrights, etc., etc. Luckily, I've found a few easy to tie knots that my not-so-nimble fingers can manage. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KNOTS | Bob La Londe | Fly Fishing | 20 | September 8th, 2005 04:03 AM |
Knots | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 0 | August 23rd, 2005 04:12 PM |
Trilene Sensation will KNOT cut the mustard. | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 1 | March 29th, 2004 10:46 PM |
knot strength? | steve | General Discussion | 2 | November 1st, 2003 11:37 AM |
Best knot for Power Pro tied to a crank bait? | Richard Liebert | Bass Fishing | 4 | October 21st, 2003 05:12 AM |