A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Am I reading this right?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 18th, 2007, 05:08 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Larry L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 994
Default Am I reading this right?

I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork
watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total
precipitation is well over 100% of average.

Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these

ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/update/id.txt




  #2  
Old December 18th, 2007, 05:40 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Am I reading this right?

On Dec 18, 10:08 am, "Larry L" wrote:
I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork
watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total
precipitation is well over 100% of average.

Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these


I could be wrong but I think the lower SWE number just means that the
precipitation was light fluffy snow rather than heavy snow (or rain).
If the snow was heavier than average, then I think you could get a
higher SWE number than the precip number.

I've always thought that the snowpack numbers were different still --
because it measures what is actually accumulating on the ground,
rather than what fell. Although certainly correlated, this can be
different due to a variety of reasons; down by us we can have
significant mid-season melts. An early warm spring can drop snowpack
numbers down below average (for that time of year), even if the season
has been above average.

Just my 0.01999998,

Jon.
  #3  
Old December 18th, 2007, 07:14 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Bob Weinberger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Am I reading this right?


"Larry L" wrote in message
...
I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork
watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total
precipitation is well over 100% of average.

Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these

ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/update/id.txt

Jon has it pretty much covered, but the major disconnect between total
precip and the snow water equivalent is due to the difference in the way the
two metrics are tracked. Total precip is measured over the "water year"
which, for the NRCS, is Oct 1 to Sep 30, while snow water equivalent is
measured by actually measuring the snowpack (either using corings of the
snowpack at the measuring site or by "pillows" that are located on site &
measure the weight of the snow on top of them) on the date reported. Any
precip that fell in the form of rain before the snow pack started to build
would not show up as snow water equivalent (nor would any that wasn't
retained in the snow pack - melted or simply ran thru).

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uh-oh...(Tom, sit down while reading...) [email protected] Fly Fishing 6 January 22nd, 2006 04:02 AM
Good reading! [email protected] UK Coarse Fishing 0 September 10th, 2005 11:37 AM
Thank-you for reading my message GuitarMan General Discussion 0 August 2nd, 2005 01:58 PM
Winter Reading Frank Reid Fly Fishing 32 January 26th, 2005 03:44 AM
Brad, Am I Reading This Right? go-bassn Bass Fishing 6 August 25th, 2004 11:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.