![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork
watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total precipitation is well over 100% of average. Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/update/id.txt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 18, 10:08 am, "Larry L" wrote:
I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total precipitation is well over 100% of average. Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these I could be wrong but I think the lower SWE number just means that the precipitation was light fluffy snow rather than heavy snow (or rain). If the snow was heavier than average, then I think you could get a higher SWE number than the precip number. I've always thought that the snowpack numbers were different still -- because it measures what is actually accumulating on the ground, rather than what fell. Although certainly correlated, this can be different due to a variety of reasons; down by us we can have significant mid-season melts. An early warm spring can drop snowpack numbers down below average (for that time of year), even if the season has been above average. Just my 0.01999998, Jon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... I "think" but am not sure that this is saying that the Henry's Fork watershed has a snowpack at 79% of average even though the total precipitation is well over 100% of average. Is "snowpack" what "snow water equivalent" means? is these ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/update/id.txt Jon has it pretty much covered, but the major disconnect between total precip and the snow water equivalent is due to the difference in the way the two metrics are tracked. Total precip is measured over the "water year" which, for the NRCS, is Oct 1 to Sep 30, while snow water equivalent is measured by actually measuring the snowpack (either using corings of the snowpack at the measuring site or by "pillows" that are located on site & measure the weight of the snow on top of them) on the date reported. Any precip that fell in the form of rain before the snow pack started to build would not show up as snow water equivalent (nor would any that wasn't retained in the snow pack - melted or simply ran thru). Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uh-oh...(Tom, sit down while reading...) | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 6 | January 22nd, 2006 04:02 AM |
Good reading! | [email protected] | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | September 10th, 2005 11:37 AM |
Thank-you for reading my message | GuitarMan | General Discussion | 0 | August 2nd, 2005 01:58 PM |
Winter Reading | Frank Reid | Fly Fishing | 32 | January 26th, 2005 03:44 AM |
Brad, Am I Reading This Right? | go-bassn | Bass Fishing | 6 | August 25th, 2004 11:27 PM |