Meanwhile, over at MCCain headquarters...

....since everyone is sleeping 23 1/2 hours a day, at least the TylenolPM
consumption is down considerably...

They have met the enemy, and it's...it's...it's...oh, yeah, Saddam bin
Ladin...

HTH,
R
.....now wait just a fluthermocking minute - didn't they hang that
sockcucker in a spiderhole, like, a year or something ago...yeah, yeah,
I saw it on EweTube...CHANGE YA CAN BELIEVE IN...Froots-o-da-Looms...

On 2-Apr-2008, wrote:

ince everyone is sleeping 23 1/2 hours a day, at least the TylenolPM
consumption is down considerably...

They have met the enemy, and it's...it's...it's...oh, yeah, Saddam bin
Ladin...

HTH,
R

Hey - let me ask you a question pls
Without starting a flaming war can you keep politics to an OT post

Politics **** me off and depress me - much less our views differ a bit -but
wouldya pls mark it OT from now on I believe that not to do so would be
contrary to internet and list etiquette

Please

Thanks in advance
Fred

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:17:04 GMT, wrote:


On 2-Apr-2008, wrote:

ince everyone is sleeping 23 1/2 hours a day, at least the TylenolPM
consumption is down considerably...

They have met the enemy, and it's...it's...it's...oh, yeah, Saddam bin
Ladin...

HTH,
R

Hey - let me ask you a question pls
Without starting a flaming war can you keep politics to an OT post

Politics **** me off and depress me - much less our views differ a bit -but
wouldya pls mark it OT from now on I believe that not to do so would be
contrary to internet and list etiquette

Ya know, at first glance, your request seems reasonable enough, yet on
second thought, it seems like more of your silly, whiny horse****. Let
me ask you some questions:

1) When you saw the subject of the original post, did you honestly
believe that the contents might be "on topic" - that I might have had
some secret fly recipes from the McCain HQ or something?

2) Given 1, above, why did you not only open it, but read it, and then,
feel compelled to reply to it (and not add "OT" to the subject if it's
so friggin' important to you...).

3) Why don't you mark your foul-mouthed lunatic rants as "OT?"

And for the rest, I'd offer that since by convention there really is no
"off topic" on ROFF, the use of "OT" could be argued to be misplaced.
Plus, I give most ROFFians at least enough credit to be able to
determine that something is not FFing-related by the subject line (yeah,
even good ol' Fred - I've no doubt that he was not under the mistaken
impression that the original post was somehow FFing-related).

R

Okay, that's it....somebody gimme a beer..


jo(burp)hn

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:50:00 -0800, "asadi"
wrote:

Okay, that's it....somebody gimme a beer..


jo(burp)hn

Hmm...well, OK...so **** you - or not - as the case may be...

And there it is,
R

On Apr 3, 8:38*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:50:00 -0800, "asadi"

wrote:
Okay, that's it....somebody gimme a beer..

jo(burp)hn

Hmm...well, OK...so **** you - or not - as the case may be...

And there it is,
R

So whats the GOP paying you with to propogandize roff this time? Last
time it appears you got to sell pickles to Halliburton. Can't you just
be happy as a war profitteer? Must be hard shaving in the dark.

) Why don't you mark your foul-mouthed lunatic rants as "OT?"

And for the rest, I'd offer that since by convention there really is no
"off topic" on ROFF, the use of "OT" could be argued to be misplaced.
Plus, I give most ROFFians at least enough credit to be able to
determine that something is not FFing-related by the subject line (yeah,
even good ol' Fred - I've no doubt that he was not under the mistaken
impression that the original post was somehow FFing-related).

R

Yo rdeann

You are a totally useless and misinformed ****head!
You don't even have the courtesy to follow internet etiquette or protocol
Perhaps you are too stupid to do so
Your political opinions seem to be pretty asinine also
I have o hope for you whatsoever so ESAD
Goodbye and good riddance - fool!

plonk