And I wonder with how many Bible-clutchers he has email conversations...?

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...sh-on-obama-2/

OTOH, it might be that Ms. Johansson is a bit more easily amazed than
some...

Maybe Obama is trying to pick up the clean end of the turd or
something...

Another sheesh,
R

On Jun 11, 9:36*am, wrote:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...t-a-crush-on-o...

OTOH, it might be that Ms. Johansson is a bit more easily amazed than
some...

Maybe Obama is trying to pick up the clean end of the turd or
something...

Another sheesh,
R

Dumbass. If your going to spend the next 6 monts pimping McCain do it
elsewhere.

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:39:37 -0700 (PDT), BJ Conner
wrote:

On Jun 11, 9:36*am, wrote:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...t-a-crush-on-o...

OTOH, it might be that Ms. Johansson is a bit more easily amazed than
some...

Maybe Obama is trying to pick up the clean end of the turd or
something...

Another sheesh,
R

Dumbass. If your going to spend the next 6 monts pimping McCain do it
elsewhere.

What's to pimp? I do think McCain would make a fair enough choice,
depending on running mate, but between McCain and Obama, it's basically
a coin-toss, assuming Obama lives up to the hype (and that he doesn't
make some ****ed-up choice for veep). If Obama wins, he'll surely go
down in history...I just hope it's for all the right reasons. And if he
lives up to the hype, he oughta make a decent enough Prez - assuming he
has nothing whatsoever to do with the Clintons or any hard-core
Clintonistas. If he wins and doesn't live up to hype - generally and
broadly speaking; I don't mean to imply he need be "perfect" because
there ain't no such thing - it'll be a friggin' disaster. IAC, I still
maintain that given the array of realistic contenders, the only "dream
ticket" (and I use that term loosely) was and is McCain AND Obama.

TC,
R