A Plea for Sanity

Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. BTW, if you are gleaning your info from USENET,
your sources are a bit lacking, dontcha think?
EOT, at least insofar as wallowing with you is concerned.
Tom

Tom Littleton wrote:

Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. ...

================================================== ==============================
p.s. I always liked the sporting bar analogy
of ROFF, but in a real bar, one can enjoy
watching people getting tossed after making nuisances of themselves....or,
getting their asses kicked.


I feel you are a perfect example of the kind of Usenet participant who talks
one way online, and hasn't the balls to do the same in person. I would be more
than happy to say so to your face, should I encounter you.
================================================== ==============================

Big bad Usenet talk, you sound like the putz.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...
Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. BTW, if you are gleaning your info from
USENET,
your sources are a bit lacking, dontcha think?
EOT, at least insofar as wallowing with you is concerned.
Tom

"eot"...ah, a phrase to be valued, and to be seen more often, in a
better time. fewer friendships would be lost, and thereby less loss to life
itself.

wayno

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 00:23:06 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Big bad Usenet talk,

Yet another irony meter shot to ****.
--
Charlie...

Wayne Harrison wrote:

ah, well, i am old enough to realize that friends are easily made, but
lost only with difficulty and regret. sorry, ken.

What in the hell are you sorry about ? Or are you a graduate
of the Dave LaCourse school of insincere apologies ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Tommy Littleton sneered:

Forty notes:

**** that ****.


as predictable, as it is trivial, a comment.


No more trivial than your hypocritical plea, just quite a
bit less verbose.


Just a bit. The essence would have read:

"I'm proud to be an asshole and anyone who doesn't like
it can **** off."

Willi

Ken Fortenberry wrote:

Tom Littleton threatens again:


ok, Ken, we have a semantics issue here. ...


Semantics, my ass, you sanctimonious little prick, and I'd
be more than happy to say that in your face if I'm ever so
unfortunate as to cross paths with you.



Better watch it Tom, the last time Ken called you a sanctimonious little
prick wannabe, this time you've graduated to a full fledged
sanctimonious little prick. I'm jealous. I thought he had that label
reserved just for me.

Willi

Willi notes:
this time you've graduated to a full fledged
sanctimonious little prick. I'm jealous. I thought he had that label
reserved just for me.

Shoot, I was just getting to like "Dumbo"...
Tom

Willi wrote:

Better watch it Tom, the last time Ken called you a sanctimonious little
prick wannabe, this time you've graduated to a full fledged
sanctimonious little prick. I'm jealous. I thought he had that label
reserved just for me.

You've graduated Willi, you've been the sanctimonious little prick
with a high horse welded on his arse for some time now. I was just
waiting for your diploma to come back from the printers.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Tom Littleton" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Willi notes:
this time you've graduated to a full fledged
sanctimonious little prick. I'm jealous. I thought he had that label
reserved just for me.

Shoot, I was just getting to like "Dumbo"...
Tom


You see? You can´t forget either. Once something is said on here, then no
amount of apologising, sincere or otherwise is going to make it unsaid.

Replying in kind, is not the way to "sanity".

TL
MC