On track for a 2020 ban on sportsfishing?

On 29 Jul 2006 08:34:46 -0700, wrote:

I
point to the Norwegian document, as tired as it is, often, because, I
believe it is the most defensable stance and a good, fair, one most
folks would probably agree with.

Just out of curiosity, what changes in fishing can you point to that are a
direct result of the Norwegian document?
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

Charlie Choc wrote:
On 29 Jul 2006 08:34:46 -0700, wrote:

I
point to the Norwegian document, as tired as it is, often, because, I
believe it is the most defensable stance and a good, fair, one most
folks would probably agree with.

Just out of curiosity, what changes in fishing can you point to that are a
direct result of the Norwegian document?
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

None and that's the point. Traditional fishing has been going on
feeding the animals and people of this unbelievable planet for the 10's
of thousands of years. It has been redfined in a few places in the past
40.The Norwegians clearly understand fishing and fisheries management.
But mostly they speak of 'respect for life" which is impossible when we
exploit, stress, maim and kill an animal solely for our own pleasure,
is this not true Choc?

From the report:
"Summary
A form of angling where fish, once caught, are then released, known as
"catch and release", is prevalent in a number of countries. The
authorities are now considering whether the concept should be
introduced as a way of limiting catches in some Norwegian rivers. The
"catch and release" concept is a new principle in natural resource
management compared with the catch regulation measures adopted
previously. "Catch and release" completely separates fishing from its
original purpose, which was to procure food. In the view of the
Council, it is important to support and develop attitudes that
safeguard natural resources and manage them in a sustainable manner.
This also entails a respect for life. There is little doubt that fish
experience pain and stress in connection with fishing, regardless of
whether they are killed or released. The difference is that a fish that
is caught and released is subjected to this stress merely to satisfy
people's need for recreation. The suffering and damage inflicted on the
fish in this connection is disregarded. The Council does not find it
ethically acceptable to use live animals in this way. If the fishing
stock is so low that it will not tolerate harvesting the alternative in
the view of the Council is not to fish. Against this background, the
Council advises against the introduction of "catch and release" as a
resource management measure in Norway."

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel

On 30 Jul 2006 07:28:48 -0700, wrote:


Charlie Choc wrote:
On 29 Jul 2006 08:34:46 -0700, wrote:

I
point to the Norwegian document, as tired as it is, often, because, I
believe it is the most defensable stance and a good, fair, one most
folks would probably agree with.

Just out of curiosity, what changes in fishing can you point to that are a
direct result of the Norwegian document?
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

None and that's the point. Traditional fishing has been going on
feeding the animals and people of this unbelievable planet for the 10's
of thousands of years. It has been redfined in a few places in the past
40.The Norwegians clearly understand fishing and fisheries management.

Norway does not prohibit catch and release fishing.
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

precisely! the "Norway paper" was penned by a small committee and ignored by
Sport Fishery Managers in that country. When Tim 1st brought that paper
forward here on ROFF 6 or so years ago we had a member from Norway who laid
that all out.

--
Some of my angling snaps:

http://gallery.fishbc.com/gallery/vi...bumName=RalphH
"Charlie Choc" wrote in message
...
On 30 Jul 2006 07:28:48 -0700, wrote:


Charlie Choc wrote:
On 29 Jul 2006 08:34:46 -0700, wrote:

I
point to the Norwegian document, as tired as it is, often, because, I
believe it is the most defensable stance and a good, fair, one most
folks would probably agree with.

Just out of curiosity, what changes in fishing can you point to that are
a
direct result of the Norwegian document?
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

None and that's the point. Traditional fishing has been going on
feeding the animals and people of this unbelievable planet for the 10's
of thousands of years. It has been redfined in a few places in the past
40.The Norwegians clearly understand fishing and fisheries management.

Norway does not prohibit catch and release fishing.
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

wrote:
...The Norwegians clearly understand fishing and fisheries management.
But mostly they speak of 'respect for life"....

Well, o.k., yeah, that seems like a good enough reason to kill fish.

Wolfgang