![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Serious question: Specifically, why is a regulation that, at the minimum: 1) shows respect for a wild animal No, I doubt very seriously that regs are in place to show respect for fish. 2) improves the quality of fishng and the health of the fishery Yes, I would hope so. 3) creates a defensible position for the future of angling Yes, again. A "hair-brained" scheme? Yes! Also, I am NOT the one ramming this down anyones's throats. Yes you are. You yourself call trout fishing a sport. If you believe that from it's inception that fly or any other form of fishing has been solely about sustenance, you would be wrong. "Sport" of all kind has been with us since man recognised his passion for competition, regardless of who or what he competed against. In the 2006 Colorado fishing pamphlet there are more and more rivers under ridiculous regulations and 'Catch and Release Recommended" signs erected by trout unlimited mavens along the stream. This is an absolute attack on me as an angler. How? "Catch and Release Recommended" is not a pohibition on catch and kill! I do NOT support the current 'trend' in flyfishing regulations where the 'conservation leaders' have the BALLS to espouse angling 'competitions' on the public, moving waters of Colorado and then lie that it is 'for conservation'. Who said that you had to? I've had all sorts of things "recommended" to me that I was not inclined to follow. No way should we use a wild animal like this and no way will I buy the spooge these people are selling. Are you a donating PETA member? If you are not donating to their cause, you surely should be. But, please, do NOT say that I am forcing anything down anyone's throats, just the opposite, I am protecting my right to fish to catch, kill and eat fish. Come to NC. There are many *wild* trout stream in our national forests that are catch and kill friendly. Op Thanks, TBone |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mr. Opus McDopus wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Serious question: Specifically, why is a regulation that, at the minimum: 1) shows respect for a wild animal No, I doubt very seriously that regs are in place to show respect for fish. 2) improves the quality of fishng and the health of the fishery Yes, I would hope so. 3) creates a defensible position for the future of angling Yes, again. A "hair-brained" scheme? Yes! Also, I am NOT the one ramming this down anyones's throats. Yes you are. You yourself call trout fishing a sport. If you believe that from it's inception that fly or any other form of fishing has been solely about sustenance, you would be wrong. "Sport" of all kind has been with us since man recognised his passion for competition, regardless of who or what he competed against. In the 2006 Colorado fishing pamphlet there are more and more rivers under ridiculous regulations and 'Catch and Release Recommended" signs erected by trout unlimited mavens along the stream. This is an absolute attack on me as an angler. How? "Catch and Release Recommended" is not a pohibition on catch and kill! I do NOT support the current 'trend' in flyfishing regulations where the 'conservation leaders' have the BALLS to espouse angling 'competitions' on the public, moving waters of Colorado and then lie that it is 'for conservation'. Who said that you had to? I've had all sorts of things "recommended" to me that I was not inclined to follow. No way should we use a wild animal like this and no way will I buy the spooge these people are selling. Are you a donating PETA member? If you are not donating to their cause, you surely should be. But, please, do NOT say that I am forcing anything down anyone's throats, just the opposite, I am protecting my right to fish to catch, kill and eat fish. Come to NC. There are many *wild* trout stream in our national forests that are catch and kill friendly. Op Thanks, TBone You seriously underestimate me Op. Trust me on one thing, I use my terms carefully. That I fully understand the difference between a sport and a pastime should be clear. As Thomas McIntyre suggests, a pastime is playing frisbee on the beach or 3 putting the 9th, while true sport as Ortega y Gasset, the Spanish philospher says, involves homage, dedication and the death of a wild animal. That it is serious business, and I quote: "One does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, one kills in order to have hunted...If one were to present the sportsman with the death of the animal as a gift he would refuse it. What he is after is having to win it, to conquer the surly brute through his own effort and skill with all the extras that this carries with it: the immersion in the countryside, the healthfulness of the exercise, the distraction from his job. Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Hunting. Your pal, TBone Guilt repolaced the creel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had hoped this group would be a departure from the idiot conversations
and stupid Ideas sometimes expressed at Roff but I see its just another rubber room for the lunitic fringe. I will not bother with it again. good day. wrote in message oups.com... Mr. Opus McDopus wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Serious question: Specifically, why is a regulation that, at the minimum: 1) shows respect for a wild animal No, I doubt very seriously that regs are in place to show respect for fish. 2) improves the quality of fishng and the health of the fishery Yes, I would hope so. 3) creates a defensible position for the future of angling Yes, again. A "hair-brained" scheme? Yes! Also, I am NOT the one ramming this down anyones's throats. Yes you are. You yourself call trout fishing a sport. If you believe that from it's inception that fly or any other form of fishing has been solely about sustenance, you would be wrong. "Sport" of all kind has been with us since man recognised his passion for competition, regardless of who or what he competed against. In the 2006 Colorado fishing pamphlet there are more and more rivers under ridiculous regulations and 'Catch and Release Recommended" signs erected by trout unlimited mavens along the stream. This is an absolute attack on me as an angler. How? "Catch and Release Recommended" is not a pohibition on catch and kill! I do NOT support the current 'trend' in flyfishing regulations where the 'conservation leaders' have the BALLS to espouse angling 'competitions' on the public, moving waters of Colorado and then lie that it is 'for conservation'. Who said that you had to? I've had all sorts of things "recommended" to me that I was not inclined to follow. No way should we use a wild animal like this and no way will I buy the spooge these people are selling. Are you a donating PETA member? If you are not donating to their cause, you surely should be. But, please, do NOT say that I am forcing anything down anyone's throats, just the opposite, I am protecting my right to fish to catch, kill and eat fish. Come to NC. There are many *wild* trout stream in our national forests that are catch and kill friendly. Op Thanks, TBone You seriously underestimate me Op. Trust me on one thing, I use my terms carefully. That I fully understand the difference between a sport and a pastime should be clear. As Thomas McIntyre suggests, a pastime is playing frisbee on the beach or 3 putting the 9th, while true sport as Ortega y Gasset, the Spanish philospher says, involves homage, dedication and the death of a wild animal. That it is serious business, and I quote: "One does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, one kills in order to have hunted...If one were to present the sportsman with the death of the animal as a gift he would refuse it. What he is after is having to win it, to conquer the surly brute through his own effort and skill with all the extras that this carries with it: the immersion in the countryside, the healthfulness of the exercise, the distraction from his job. Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Hunting. Your pal, TBone Guilt repolaced the creel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cheeses of nazareth typed:
I had hoped this group would be a departure from the idiot conversations and stupid Ideas sometimes expressed at Roff but I see its just another rubber room for the lunitic fringe. I will not bother with it again. good day. You will be missed, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() cheesesofnazareth wrote: I had hoped this group would be a departure from the idiot conversations and stupid Ideas sometimes expressed at Roff but I see its just another rubber room for the lunitic fringe. I will not bother with it again. good day. wrote in message oups.com... Mr. Opus McDopus wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Serious question: Specifically, why is a regulation that, at the minimum: 1) shows respect for a wild animal No, I doubt very seriously that regs are in place to show respect for fish. 2) improves the quality of fishng and the health of the fishery Yes, I would hope so. 3) creates a defensible position for the future of angling Yes, again. A "hair-brained" scheme? Yes! Also, I am NOT the one ramming this down anyones's throats. Yes you are. You yourself call trout fishing a sport. If you believe that from it's inception that fly or any other form of fishing has been solely about sustenance, you would be wrong. "Sport" of all kind has been with us since man recognised his passion for competition, regardless of who or what he competed against. In the 2006 Colorado fishing pamphlet there are more and more rivers under ridiculous regulations and 'Catch and Release Recommended" signs erected by trout unlimited mavens along the stream. This is an absolute attack on me as an angler. How? "Catch and Release Recommended" is not a pohibition on catch and kill! I do NOT support the current 'trend' in flyfishing regulations where the 'conservation leaders' have the BALLS to espouse angling 'competitions' on the public, moving waters of Colorado and then lie that it is 'for conservation'. Who said that you had to? I've had all sorts of things "recommended" to me that I was not inclined to follow. No way should we use a wild animal like this and no way will I buy the spooge these people are selling. Are you a donating PETA member? If you are not donating to their cause, you surely should be. But, please, do NOT say that I am forcing anything down anyone's throats, just the opposite, I am protecting my right to fish to catch, kill and eat fish. Come to NC. There are many *wild* trout stream in our national forests that are catch and kill friendly. Op Thanks, TBone You seriously underestimate me Op. Trust me on one thing, I use my terms carefully. That I fully understand the difference between a sport and a pastime should be clear. As Thomas McIntyre suggests, a pastime is playing frisbee on the beach or 3 putting the 9th, while true sport as Ortega y Gasset, the Spanish philospher says, involves homage, dedication and the death of a wild animal. That it is serious business, and I quote: "One does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, one kills in order to have hunted...If one were to present the sportsman with the death of the animal as a gift he would refuse it. What he is after is having to win it, to conquer the surly brute through his own effort and skill with all the extras that this carries with it: the immersion in the countryside, the healthfulness of the exercise, the distraction from his job. Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Hunting. Your pal, TBone Guilt repolaced the creel Hi Cheeses, This group will only be as good as the contributors. There are several great articles to reply to here already, or you could post some original content! OBAF: When fishing tiny midges in or under the film, try a very, very small piece of foam strike-on indicator about 18" up from the fly. This will help you keep an eye on where your fly is, will buoy it and will serve to help detect the sip. Your pal, Halfordian Golfer Guilt replaced the creel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() cheeses of nazareth wrote in message ... I had hoped this group would be a departure from the idiot conversations and stupid Ideas sometimes expressed at Roff but I see its just another rubber room for the lunitic fringe. I will not bother with it again. good day. Geez, cheeze whiz. What's got your panties in a sticky mess? If ya ain't got anything to offer, other than a whiny assed post, I'd figure ya coulda just passed on by, without a cryin'! Op |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... You seriously underestimate me Op. I've never tried to estimate you at all, Tim. Trust me on one thing, I use my terms carefully. "wet golfing"? Um...thats' when someone golfs during a rainstorm, IMMHO. That I fully understand the difference between a sport and a pastime should be clear. As Thomas McIntyre suggests, a pastime is playing frisbee on the beach or 3 putting the 9th, while true sport as Ortega y Gasset, the Spanish philospher says, involves homage, dedication and the death of a wild animal. That it is serious business, and I quote: So, a "sport" is only when something has to die? Funny, they call football, baseball, basketball....sports. Of course, there are no wild animals involved in those sports. 'coon hunters don't always kill their prey nor do bear hunters, yet they are still hunters, I think. It's pretty common, around these parts, for bear and 'coon hunters to tree their prey and not kill them. Sometimes it's for training, sometimes it's because the bear or 'coon is a female with cubs and whatever 'coon babies are called, sometimes it's just for that sport of it! They just love to hear their dogs baying. "One does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, one kills in order to have hunted...If one were to present the sportsman with the death of the animal as a gift he would refuse it. What he is after is having to win it, to conquer the surly brute through his own effort and skill with all the extras that this carries with it: the immersion in the countryside, the healthfulness of the exercise, the distraction from his job. Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Hunting. That this fella believes the way that he does/did, doesn't make it gospel! You can quote others until the cows come home, but it don't make it a fact! Your pal, TBone Guilt repolaced the creel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
parachute worth question...... | Sandy Pittendrigh | Fly Fishing Tying | 13 | April 17th, 2006 03:31 PM |
See-throughs - long question | rb608 | Fly Fishing | 42 | December 16th, 2005 03:50 AM |
Sonar Question | Joshuall | Bass Fishing | 7 | February 8th, 2005 11:15 AM |
Steve Huber - Lure Question | GL3Loomis | Bass Fishing | 3 | February 3rd, 2005 03:25 AM |
Old, old, antique fishing reel question? | Suthern Transplant | Bass Fishing | 1 | January 9th, 2005 02:07 AM |