Fishing for stocked fish.

On 18 Sep, 18:14, BJ Conner wrote:

Andrew
Purvis could never write an article on the subject of how good
something is., it wouldn't sell papers.

You on the other hand, with your impeccable spelling and grammar,
healthy views on politics, or indeed anything at all of which you seem
to be almost totally ignorant, are very good at writing how bad
something is, and even better at writing something badly, as we are
all most painfully aware.

MC

On Sep 18, 9:38 am, Mike wrote:
On 18 Sep, 18:14, BJ Conner wrote:

Andrew

Purvis could never write an article on the subject of how good
something is., it wouldn't sell papers.

You on the other hand, with your impeccable spelling and grammar,
healthy views on politics, or indeed anything at all of which you seem
to be almost totally ignorant, are very good at writing how bad
something is, and even better at writing something badly, as we are
all most painfully aware.

MC

Nothing misspelled.
You have never had an original thought in your life.

On 18 Sep, 18:45, BJ Conner wrote:


Nothing misspelled.
You have never had an original thought in your life.

"articals about the sky falling "

"Good" nuclear wars are very rare.

You would not recognise an original thought even if it somehow managed
to stray into your obviously clouded brain. As you never have
anything interesting or positive to say, I will go back to ignoring
you.

Have you noticed that quite a few others seem to be ignoring you too?

Fortenberry trashes people in order to boost his ego, and I suppose
you do it for much the same reason, unfortunately, you are a very
great deal more stupid than he is, and the results are simply
pathetic. You would be well advised to stop even trying.

MC

"Mike" wrote in message
ps.com...
On 18 Sep, 18:45, BJ Conner wrote:

Have you noticed that quite a few others seem to be ignoring you too?

Fortenberry trashes people in order to boost his ego, and I suppose
you do it for much the same reason, unfortunately, you are a very
great deal more stupid than he is, and the results are simply
pathetic. You would be well advised to stop even trying.

MC


The only one I have seen Fortenberry trash is you, and with good cause. Now
if you where to take into consideration the sarcasm that Mr. Conner wrote
the comment about a good nuclear war would fix things, you would actually
have a clue. BUT wait, you have no clue you mindless waste of Oxygen.



Rick

"Rick" lanr-at-centurytel.net wrote in message
et...

"Mike" wrote in message
ps.com...
On 18 Sep, 18:45, BJ Conner wrote:

Have you noticed that quite a few others seem to be ignoring you too?

Fortenberry trashes people in order to boost his ego, and I suppose
you do it for much the same reason, unfortunately, you are a very
great deal more stupid than he is, and the results are simply
pathetic. You would be well advised to stop even trying.

MC


The only one I have seen Fortenberry trash is you, and with good cause.
Now if you where to take into consideration the sarcasm that Mr. Conner
wrote the comment about a good nuclear war would fix things, you would
actually have a clue. BUT wait, you have no clue you mindless waste of
Oxygen.



Rick

Wow, you cheeseheads are a HARSH bunch!

Wolfgang

On 18 Sep, 20:33, "Rick" lanr-at-centurytel.net wrote:


The only one I have seen Fortenberry trash is you, and with good cause. Now
if you where to take into consideration the sarcasm that Mr. Conner wrote
the comment about a good nuclear war would fix things, you would actually
have a clue. BUT wait, you have no clue you mindless waste of Oxygen.

Rick

Well, taking into consideration that you are obviously an idiot, I am
bound to assume that the best way to deal with you is to ignore you.
Well done, I usually wait for a couple of posts, in order to determine
whether what some people write is merely a temporary lapse of good
sense and judgement, or a permanent aberration.

Congratulations, you are on the ignore list almost immediately.

MC

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:02:28 -0700, Mike
wrote:

On 18 Sep, 20:33, "Rick" lanr-at-centurytel.net wrote:


The only one I have seen Fortenberry trash is you, and with good cause. Now
if you where to take into consideration the sarcasm that Mr. Conner wrote
the comment about a good nuclear war would fix things, you would actually
have a clue. BUT wait, you have no clue you mindless waste of Oxygen.

Rick

Well, taking into consideration that you are obviously an idiot, I am
bound to assume that the best way to deal with you is to ignore you.
Well done, I usually wait for a couple of posts, in order to determine
whether what some people write is merely a temporary lapse of good
sense and judgement, or a permanent aberration.

Congratulations, you are on the ignore list almost immediately.

Translation: "I'll be posting 4 to 6 replies, each roughly the size of
'War and Peace' and containing not less than 23 links, to every reply of
yours!"

Dickie boy

On 18 Sep, 21:09, wrote:

Translation: "I'll be posting 4 to 6 replies, each roughly the size of
'War and Peace' and containing not less than 23 links, to every reply of
yours!"

Dickie boy

Although that is unlikely in the extreme Dickie boy, like a lot of
other rubbish you write, it pleases me that the thought of it ****es
you off. Shouldn´t you be festooning nails or something?

MC

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:02:28 -0700, Mike
wrote:

Congratulations, you are on the ignore list almost immediately.

Count your blessings, Rich. If only Fortenberry, Richard, Wolfgang,
me, et al were on his ignore list.

Dave

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:02:28 -0700, Mike
wrote:

Congratulations, you are on the ignore list almost immediately.

Count your blessings, Rich. If only Fortenberry, Richard, Wolfgang,
me, et al were on his ignore list.

I'm o.k. where I'm at.

Thanks.

Wolfgang