![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Nov, 21:09, "Tom Nakashima" wrote:
I read an article over the holidays about a technique of cutting the taper of a double taper line when nymph fishing. The reasons were to have better line management control, and the ability to throw large weighted flies with ease, plus a nice drift. The article stated that since dry-fly presentation wasn't a concern, the taper was useless. I've never even considered cutting the taper off a line, and wondering if anyone has done that when nymphing? -tom The taper is not useless, it is still required, but is achieved by using a steeply tapered leader and the appropriate nylon, ( stiff!), and if you try this using a level leader, attached to level line ( or the level belly of a DT) , or a normal "limp" leader, or a normal DT, ( unless it is a very heavy line), you will have problems. The leader is tapered sharply, in order to allow turn over of the heavy fly without too much "kick back", and also to allow the fly to be moved properly at all. The steeply tapered leader is essential for power transmission to the heavy fly. If a standard tapered DT is used, most of the energy is dissipated when the taper turns over, and there is simply not enough left to propel the leader and a heavy fly. The fly just flops about out of control. The main reason for such a rig is also not casting, although it does make it easier to control heavy flies, but in the very superior line control which results. It would be easier to cast such heavy rigs using light spinning gear, but then you have no control at all, as it is more or less impossible to mend or otherwise control nylon or other line in such a way as to affect the presentation of the fly. I use a similar line/leader when casting heavy flies for pike fishing, but there the casting ease is of more importance. I also use a similar head for casting heavy flies on light gear. There are many arguments that this is not fly-fishing. May be so, I don īt know, and I donīt much care, it is however one of the few gear set- ups which will allow half-way decent casting and control of heavy set- ups. If that is what is required, then there is no reason why one should not use it. Using a heavy level line will achieve much the same thing, but you still need a sharply tapered leader. This is also not a distance rig! basically only suitable for short to middle range presentations. The lack of taper on a level line affects its casting properties considerably. If you wish to retain the properties of your line, then consider making up a multi tip rig like this; http://globalflyfisher.com/fishbetter/juro.htm this gives you a very versatile basic rig, and you can still use the "cut" DT as normal if desired. TL MC ALL THIS IS MERELY MY OPINION!!! If you donīt like it, or disagree with it, that is just fine with me. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov, 08:02, Mike wrote:
A couple of other points of note if you want to experiment with this. After you cut the line, seal the end with an appropriate waterproof glue. This rig allows greater control for several reasons. The line can be mended right to the tip. The line IS EQUALLY BUOYANT right to the tip. This means that your fly is fishing immediately below the tip of the line. With a tapered line, the tip is less buoyant, and usually pulled under by heavy rigs. This means that an indeterminate amount of fly line is below the surface, and out of your control. This also affects precise depth presentation. With very heavy rigs, you may still need a buoyant strike indicator to overcome this, even when using a buoyant level line. Precise depth presentations can be all important! By mending, one can manoeuver the fly very close to undercut banks, various obstructions etc, and still know exactly where the fly is. This is more or less impossible when the front taper of the line has sunk to some depth or other. Knowing exactly where your fly is can save you a lot of snagging, still allow you to fish in difficult places, and results in more and bigger fish. TL MC ALL THIS IS MERELY MY OPINION!!! If you donīt like it, or disagree with it, that is just fine with me. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "daytripper" wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:10:11 -0800, "Tom Nakashima" So what's a level taper fly line? -tom ahahahaha! yeah, that's pretty awkward, "taper" in that phrase is superfluous. I think "level line" would do it... /daytripper (not paid by the word) It was almost like waiting for the rainbow to take the fly. I was doing my own research on this matter and found that "Level Line" is a little different than Double Taper Line (regardless of the taper). As you know DT line is easy to mend and roll cast due to the long continuous belly of the line. The Level Line is usually of fine diameter and can be used for shooting heads or inexpensive sinking lines. The Level Line won't roll cast or mend as well. And this is probably why some anglers cut the taper off the DT line, when there is no delicate presentation involved. I would never call it a "waste" if the angler/s are using it effectively to catch fish. You can read about the function of the taper, the type of tapers, he http://www.flyfishusa.com/lines/choo...ome.html#Taper I know some of you anglers are very proficient in your fly-fishing ways. For others like myself, I do enjoy reading, researching and trying new methods and techniques. What I like about this newsgroup is reading the TR's and the techniques used, wish there was more of that instead of the name calling and **** wars. I feel if someone has an idea, be open to share it. -tom |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
Mike wrote: A couple of other points of note if you want to experiment with this. snip ALL THIS IS MERELY MY OPINION!!! If you donīt like it, or disagree with it, that is just fine with me. The disclaimer is a bit over the top and not really true in any case. If disagreement was really just fine with you then you wouldn't descend into vitriol and invective at the first hint of it. And it is considered rude and poor netiquette to respond to your own post. You should give enough thoughtful consideration to your responses so that one is enough. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike" wrote in message ... On 27 Nov, 08:02, Mike wrote: A couple of other points of note if you want to experiment with this. After you cut the line, seal the end with an appropriate waterproof glue. This rig allows greater control for several reasons. The line can be mended right to the tip. The line IS EQUALLY BUOYANT right to the tip. This means that your fly is fishing immediately below the tip of the line. With a tapered line, the tip is less buoyant, and usually pulled under by heavy rigs. This means that an indeterminate amount of fly line is below the surface, and out of your control. This also affects precise depth presentation. With very heavy rigs, you may still need a buoyant strike indicator to overcome this, even when using a buoyant level line. Precise depth presentations can be all important! By mending, one can manoeuver the fly very close to undercut banks, various obstructions etc, and still know exactly where the fly is. This is more or less impossible when the front taper of the line has sunk to some depth or other. Knowing exactly where your fly is can save you a lot of snagging, still allow you to fish in difficult places, and results in more and bigger fish. TL MC Well Mike, I'll have to say, you figured it out. I enjoyed reading what you wrote. Yes, the idea of cutting the taper off (one side) DT line is partly for the "buoyancy". You'll have to seal the end of the line indeed (common sense). Also the mending control application, to send a "cast mend" right to the beginning of the strike indicator, which is less drag on the drifting nymphs. The idea is to get that drift right. As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov, 16:06, "Tom Nakashima" wrote:
As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom It works all right, but you will find that a "taper" even if it only consists of a couple of step-downs from heavy nylon, ( best is between 60...80% of the line diameter where the line is attached) is required. If you try to use ten pound nylon as a straight through leader for instance, it will "kick back" like a mule and cause tailing loops and tangles. I use this rig for fishing very heavily weighted woolly buggers in difficult places. It gives precise control. Also, if I might make a suggestion. Simply cut your present DT line in half. Reverse one half on another reel, and use the BUTT end, (where you cut it) as the tip. This accomplishes your objectives for the "cut" line. Use the other end as normal, with the taper at the tip. This gives you two perfectly good 45 foot lines , which you can loop on as desired. TL MC |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov, 16:29, Mike wrote:
On 27 Nov, 16:06, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom It works all right, but you will find that a "taper" even if it only consists of a couple of step-downs from heavy nylon, ( best is between 60...80% of the line diameter where the line is attached) is required. PS. The stiffer the nylon, the lesser diameter you can use. TL MC |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike" wrote in message ... On 27 Nov, 16:06, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom It works all right, but you will find that a "taper" even if it only consists of a couple of step-downs from heavy nylon, ( best is between 60...80% of the line diameter where the line is attached) is required. If you try to use ten pound nylon as a straight through leader for instance, it will "kick back" like a mule and cause tailing loops and tangles. I use this rig for fishing very heavily weighted woolly buggers in difficult places. It gives precise control. Also, if I might make a suggestion. Simply cut your present DT line in half. Reverse one half on another reel, and use the BUTT end, (where you cut it) as the tip. This accomplishes your objectives for the "cut" line. Use the other end as normal, with the taper at the tip. This gives you two perfectly good 45 foot lines , which you can loop on as desired. TL MC Mike you may have missed this part, It's the custom leader for the drifting nymphs: After cutting off the taper off the DT line, a 30" piece of 40 lb. test butt section was attached with a nail knot. Attached to that a 12" piece of 20 lb. test attached with a double uni-knot (I'm sure for movement). Attached to that is a 36" piece of 10 lb. test tippet by way of blood knot. A 12" tag out of the 36" piece is tied to the 1st fly. Added was a 24" piece of 10 lb. tippet to the 2nd fly. 2- Split shots were added before the 1st fly (or splits depending on current flow), and yes a strike indicator on the 40 lb. test section. With this rig, I don't see the need for the taper. Ability to throw the rig with the heavy belly line. Good management to control the line for the drift. Good drift of the nymphs. -tom |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov, 16:53, "Tom Nakashima" wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message ... On 27 Nov, 16:06, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom It works all right, but you will find that a "taper" even if it only consists of a couple of step-downs from heavy nylon, ( best is between 60...80% of the line diameter where the line is attached) is required. If you try to use ten pound nylon as a straight through leader for instance, it will "kick back" like a mule and cause tailing loops and tangles. I use this rig for fishing very heavily weighted woolly buggers in difficult places. It gives precise control. Also, if I might make a suggestion. Simply cut your present DT line in half. Reverse one half on another reel, and use the BUTT end, (where you cut it) as the tip. This accomplishes your objectives for the "cut" line. Use the other end as normal, with the taper at the tip. This gives you two perfectly good 45 foot lines , which you can loop on as desired. TL MC Mike you may have missed this part, It's the custom leader for the drifting nymphs: After cutting off the taper off the DT line, a 30" piece of 40 lb. test butt section was attached with a nail knot. Attached to that a 12" piece of 20 lb. test attached with a double uni-knot (I'm sure for movement). Attached to that is a 36" piece of 10 lb. test tippet by way of blood knot. A 12" tag out of the 36" piece is tied to the 1st fly. Added was a 24" piece of 10 lb. tippet to the 2nd fly. 2- Split shots were added before the 1st fly (or splits depending on current flow), and yes a strike indicator on the 40 lb.. test section. With this rig, I don't see the need for the taper. Ability to throw the rig with the heavy belly line. Good management to control the line for the drift. Good drift of the nymphs. -tom No, I didnīt miss it. THAT IS THE "TAPER". These rigs wont work very well without a taper of some sort. In this case the leader is the taper. The energy transfer to the leader is direct from the fly-line, and as it is the thick ( belly )level part of the line, the maximum energy is transferred directly to the stiff leader butt, and so on. This causes the leader to straighten when casting, and allows control. If one merely attaches a standard tapered leader to the line, or indeed any leader without a steep taper originating in a stiff nylon butt close to the line diameter, then it will kick back massively causing tangles and loss of control. TL MC |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike" wrote in message ... On 27 Nov, 16:53, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: "Mike" wrote in message ... On 27 Nov, 16:06, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: As I indicated with this rig, one is not throwing heavy dry-flies. A taper is "not" needed. It's a rig set-up specifically for drifting nymphs. For me it's worth a try, if it doesn't work I can always reverse the DT line and use the tapered side. -tom It works all right, but you will find that a "taper" even if it only consists of a couple of step-downs from heavy nylon, ( best is between 60...80% of the line diameter where the line is attached) is required. If you try to use ten pound nylon as a straight through leader for instance, it will "kick back" like a mule and cause tailing loops and tangles. I use this rig for fishing very heavily weighted woolly buggers in difficult places. It gives precise control. Also, if I might make a suggestion. Simply cut your present DT line in half. Reverse one half on another reel, and use the BUTT end, (where you cut it) as the tip. This accomplishes your objectives for the "cut" line. Use the other end as normal, with the taper at the tip. This gives you two perfectly good 45 foot lines , which you can loop on as desired. TL MC Mike you may have missed this part, It's the custom leader for the drifting nymphs: After cutting off the taper off the DT line, a 30" piece of 40 lb. test butt section was attached with a nail knot. Attached to that a 12" piece of 20 lb. test attached with a double uni-knot (I'm sure for movement). Attached to that is a 36" piece of 10 lb. test tippet by way of blood knot. A 12" tag out of the 36" piece is tied to the 1st fly. Added was a 24" piece of 10 lb. tippet to the 2nd fly. 2- Split shots were added before the 1st fly (or splits depending on current flow), and yes a strike indicator on the 40 lb. test section. With this rig, I don't see the need for the taper. Ability to throw the rig with the heavy belly line. Good management to control the line for the drift. Good drift of the nymphs. -tom No, I didnīt miss it. THAT IS THE "TAPER". These rigs wont work very well without a taper of some sort. In this case the leader is the taper. The energy transfer to the leader is direct from the fly-line, and as it is the thick ( belly )level part of the line, the maximum energy is transferred directly to the stiff leader butt, and so on. This causes the leader to straighten when casting, and allows control. If one merely attaches a standard tapered leader to the line, or indeed any leader without a steep taper originating in a stiff nylon butt close to the line diameter, then it will kick back massively causing tangles and loss of control. TL MC YES, you got it! -tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interstate SRM 27 battery is not cutting it | SHRED | Bass Fishing | 9 | August 8th, 2007 02:55 PM |
Bass Taper Fly line Maintenance | John | Fly Fishing | 0 | February 8th, 2005 06:49 PM |
fly line taper | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 19 | October 26th, 2004 03:16 PM |
Cutting spey lines. | Svend Tang-Petersen | Fly Fishing | 16 | January 14th, 2004 08:54 PM |
Cutting Rabbit Hides | Warren Witkowski | Fly Fishing | 7 | January 3rd, 2004 02:47 AM |