waterboarding

wrote:

...and it's effective, too...

Yeah? How do you know?

"JR" wrote in message
...
wrote:

...and it's effective, too...

Yeah? How do you know?

I believe Richard was correcting the ROFF's own Theo-Neocon's grammar.

Davie, the illiterate expert on Native American ancestories and torture
techniques, stated that the act of torture via *waterboarding* was
"affective."

Op

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:41:27 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

Davie, the illiterate expert on Native American ancestories and torture
techniques, stated th

Screw you, fat and ugly redneck.

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:41:27 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

Davie, the illiterate expert on Native American ancestories and torture
techniques, stated th

Screw you, fat and ugly redneck.

While I have no issue with homosexual proclivities, I am a heterosexual;
therefore, I can't ablige you in your endeavors to achieve certain
fantasies.

I'll give ya "fat and ugly" but, if I do sayso myself, you fit into the
"redneck" category much better than myself.

If fat and ugly rednecks are the subject of your affections, might I suggest
that you contact some of your Theo-Neocon buddies. However, satiating your
desire may require a move on your part to a RED state!

Does the wife know of your sexual interest in fat and ugly rednecks?

HTH

Op

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:32:02 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

While I have no issue with homosexual proclivities, I am a heterosexual;

What a laugh. You're as queer as a three dollar bill. Remember your
original net name - "Guyz and Fliez". You certainly act like one, so
I can only guess you are one, not that there's anything wrong with
that.

You still living with mommy?

Davie

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:32:02 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

While I have no issue with homosexual proclivities, I am a heterosexual;

What a laugh. You're as queer as a three dollar bill. Remember your
original net name - "Guyz and Fliez". You certainly act like one, so
I can only guess you are one, not that there's anything wrong with
that.

You still living with mommy?

Davie

Let's see, where to begin? Oh yeah, you want to **** 'fat and ugly
rednecks," and I'm a homosexual? Strange the way you think, I'd say.

It's Guys and Flyz, btw, and it comes logically from our shared hobby, which
here in ROFF is predominately comprised of male participants, thus Guyz. And
while your thoughts naturally drift toward a man's crotch, the Flyz part of
my earlier screen name pertained to the moniker given to the artificial
lures that attract the fish for which we fly fish. I know that you aren't so
simple minded not to have known that, I suspect that it's just that you
can't get your mind off of sex long enough to concentrate on the other
things that go on in life.

Oh, undoubtedly, you think there is something wrong with homosexuals,
otherwise you wouldn't hide your sexual desires behind your wife's skirts.
If I were gay, I certainly wouldn't have any qualm expressing my feelings as
such, where as you are just another Ted Haggard. Implicitly, proclaiming to
all of the world that you detest homosexuals and all that they stand for,
all the while having a trist in some run-down motel with a male prositute.

No, I haven't lived with mother in quite a few years. However, there's
always the chance that I could move back in one day. Actually, I suspect
that I will move back home to mother's, in the not too distant future. I
expect that I will have to care for her needs one day. I'll be sure to let
you know when that day comes, as you seem to be most concerned.

Anything else, your swash-buckling closet dweller?

Op

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:16:38 -0500, "Opus--Mark H. Bowen"
wrote:

Anything else, your swash-buckling closet dweller?

No. I have succeeded in really ****ing you off. Mission acomplished.

d;o)

Opus--Mark H. Bowen wrote:
"JR" wrote
wrote:

...and it's effective, too...

Yeah? How do you know?

I believe Richard was correcting the ROFF's own Theo-Neocon's grammar.

I got that, Op. Way I read it, though, after correcting Dave, he
went on to say the technique itself was effective.

Richard, if that's what you meant, how do you know?

JR wrote:
Opus--Mark H. Bowen wrote:

"JR" wrote

wrote:

...and it's effective, too...


Yeah? How do you know?


I believe Richard was correcting the ROFF's own Theo-Neocon's grammar.


I got that, Op. Way I read it, though, after correcting Dave, he went
on to say the technique itself was effective.

Richard, if that's what you meant, how do you know?

I have little doubt that it's effective to get the victim to say
anything necessary to stop it.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
JR wrote:

Opus--Mark H. Bowen wrote:

"JR" wrote

wrote:

...and it's effective, too...



Yeah? How do you know?



I believe Richard was correcting the ROFF's own Theo-Neocon's grammar.



I got that, Op. Way I read it, though, after correcting Dave, he went
on to say the technique itself was effective.

Richard, if that's what you meant, how do you know?


I have little doubt that it's effective to get the victim to say
anything necessary to stop it.


hell...when i merely watched a purported demonstration of it on some
teevee news program, i confessed to rachel all sorts of **** i never did...

it's ridiculous for anyone to claim or suggest it isn't torture...

jeff