A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

responsible flyfisherman?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 08:40 PM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?


"Ernie" wrote in message
om...

"Wolfgang" wrote
*There is a wide range of polymers that include chlorine and/or
fluorine. That a particular polymer or class of polymers

currently
used in the making of fishing lines and containing one or both of
these elements goes by the name of "fluorocarbon" should not be
construed as suggesting that older and more familiar products lack
them.



Looks like we better go back to Silk Worm Gut.
Ernie


Well, looked at from a geological perspective, or compared to other
ecologically questionable products like plutonium, petroleum and
mercury, or practices such as strip mining or clear cutting, dumping
uncounted centimeter long pieces of long chain polymers in the world's
streams, lakes, and oceans looks a wee bit less horrific.

On the other hand, I've got a mulberry tree!

Wolfgang


  #23  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 10:22 PM
Dave LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?

Greg writes:

It's Someone Else's Problem, eh ?


Where did I say that, Greg? If I'm on a stream and I see something, I will
pick it up. If I go to a bait chucker's stream (Burrell's Ford on the Chatauga
in N. Georgia), I will need a large dump truck to remove everything. I *did*
take out a small trash bag full of bait containers (looked like a Chinese Food
orgy) and other crap.

So, please, get off your high horse before you fall and hurt yourself.
Dave

http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html







  #24  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 10:23 PM
Guyz-N-Flyz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?


"steve" wrote in message
...

*BUT* one of the places I buy from carries ONE brand of flourocarbin in
the bulk for 3 cents a yard (y line) and I am thinking of switching


I wouldn't, if I were you! Ya know that stuff NEVER degrades, I've heard.

Op --who only uses black or red liquorice string--


  #25  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 10:28 PM
Dave LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?

Steve writes innocently:

Are you sure FC will degrade? The article in the flyfishing mag I read
said it will NEVER degrade. They also said that fish get caught in
snagged off leader. They werent anti FC, they were for it saying how
great it is. They just mentioned that as one con.


How long have you been fishing? Have you *EVER* seen a fish snagged in FC or
mono? I sure as hell haven't. If I use FC, I use it as a tippet, and tie on
less than two feet. In the waters I've fished, I have never seen FC *or* mono
loose in the water, much less snagging fish.

Dave

http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html







  #26  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 10:34 PM
slenon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?

Op --who only uses black or red liquorice string--

You get more strikes on the red, or the black?

Do you put a caramel on the end of the leader to keep 'em from spitting the
fly?

--
Stev Lenon

I


  #27  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 10:36 PM
Kevin Vang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?

In article ,
says...


Op --who only uses black or red liquorice string--



Take it to the baitfishin' group then.

Totally unethical.

Kevin
  #28  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 11:01 PM
Guyz-N-Flyz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?


"slenon" wrote in message
. com...
Op --who only uses black or red liquorice string--


You get more strikes on the red, or the black?

Do you put a caramel on the end of the leader to keep 'em from spitting

the
fly?

--
Stev Lenon


It's never really mattered. While liquorice is a great cause ya don't have
to tie knots (just mash leader ends together, they'll stick for a while),
limp candy seems to degrade immediately upon contact with water. Go figure?
Flyz are another problem. Findin' liquorice sting small enuff to go through
the eye of a #18 parachute Adams has been some what problematic.

Not to worry though, I'm workin' with a very fine Angel-hair pasta,
presently. Of course, ya gotta cook it first and there is seldom a kitchen
wall to throw it at, to see that it is properly done, but I'm always willin'
to try new wayz of combinin' my favorite activities: eatin' and fishin'!

Op --does anyone know, if cat gut degrades fairly rapidly, and what's it
taste like?--


  #29  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 11:02 PM
Wayne Harrison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?


"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"steve" wrote in message
...

Again you are forgetting about the line that you lose from a snag or
from a fish. If you loose it to a rock you could easily have 4 feet

of
line.


LOSE! The word is LOSE, fool.

If its mono it will break down and disintegrate. If its
polycarbin it will stay in tact for life.


INTACT is one word. And what the hell does "for life" mean? Whose
life? The life of the line? I should hope so.

(snip)
Wolfgang



then too, while fools may or may not take as long to disintegrate as
fluorocarbon line (depending on specific local conditions), they
certainly do a great deal more damage for the life of the product.


hilarious, even if just the *tiniest* bit too difficult for the subject
matter to digest; or, more accurately, to integrate.

yfitons
wayno (i'm all about syntax)

*There is a wide range of polymers that include chlorine and/or
fluorine. That a particular polymer or class of polymers currently
used in the making of fishing lines and containing one or both of
these elements goes by the name of "fluorocarbon" should not be
construed as suggesting that older and more familiar products lack
them.




  #30  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 11:03 PM
Guyz-N-Flyz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default responsible flyfisherman?


"Kevin Vang" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...


Op --who only uses black or red liquorice string--



Take it to the baitfishin' group then.

Totally unethical.

Kevin


ELITIST!

Op


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.