Jersey update

On Aug 5, 1:33*pm, riverman wrote:
On Aug 5, 6:50*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

well, John, the mere threat had them killfile me, so nothing I write appears
on there(except posts to that forum, from within the forum, where I have
amused myself a bit.

LOL. I just saw that I was killfiled also....I really don't think I
was all that offensive at all (at least by roff standards). Wish I
knew what 'trackbacks', 'pingbacks' and 'refbacks' were, since thats
all I have left.

*Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----

vB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

However, in terms of a litigation suit about using material without
permission, I would think that killfiling me actually hurts the
sysadmin's case: if I were an active poster, he could claim that I had
given tacit approval to *use my posts from roff. Now, he is clearly
saying on one hand *that my posts are NOT welcome, then he is
uploading them on the other hand.

--riverman

BTW, if it hasn't been mentioned...rofft is no longer being shown
there. But roff still is, as is the sal****er site. AFAIK, they still
dump their posts there also, but I'm not certain of that.

--riverman

On Aug 5, 1:36*pm, riverman wrote:
On Aug 5, 1:33*pm, riverman wrote:





On Aug 5, 6:50*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

well, John, the mere threat had them killfile me, so nothing I write appears
on there(except posts to that forum, from within the forum, where I have
amused myself a bit.

LOL. I just saw that I was killfiled also....I really don't think I
was all that offensive at all (at least by roff standards). Wish I
knew what 'trackbacks', 'pingbacks' and 'refbacks' were, since thats
all I have left.

*Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-----

vB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

However, in terms of a litigation suit about using material without
permission, I would think that killfiling me actually hurts the
sysadmin's case: if I were an active poster, he could claim that I had
given tacit approval to *use my posts from roff. Now, he is clearly
saying on one hand *that my posts are NOT welcome, then he is
uploading them on the other hand.

--riverman

BTW, if it hasn't been mentioned...rofft is no longer being shown
there. But roff still is, as is the sal****er site. AFAIK, they still
dump their posts there also, but I'm not certain of that.

--riverman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Damn....sorry for replying to my own post, but rofft IS still being
shown, just the shortcut is deleted.

--riverman

On Aug 5, 1:51*am, riverman wrote:
On Aug 5, 1:36*pm, riverman wrote:





On Aug 5, 1:33*pm, riverman wrote:

On Aug 5, 6:50*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

well, John, the mere threat had them killfile me, so nothing I write appears
on there(except posts to that forum, from within the forum, where I have
amused myself a bit.

LOL. I just saw that I was killfiled also....I really don't think I
was all that offensive at all (at least by roff standards). Wish I
knew what 'trackbacks', 'pingbacks' and 'refbacks' were, since thats
all I have left.

*Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

---------------------------------------------------------------------------***-----

vB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

However, in terms of a litigation suit about using material without
permission, I would think that killfiling me actually hurts the
sysadmin's case: if I were an active poster, he could claim that I had
given tacit approval to *use my posts from roff. Now, he is clearly
saying on one hand *that my posts are NOT welcome, then he is
uploading them on the other hand.

--riverman

BTW, if it hasn't been mentioned...rofft is no longer being shown
there. But roff still is, as is the sal****er site. AFAIK, they still
dump their posts there also, but I'm not certain of that.

--riverman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Damn....sorry for replying to my own post, but rofft IS still being
shown, just the shortcut is deleted.

--riverman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Riverman, You truely are an idiot in every sense of the word.

http://groups.google.st/group/rec.ou...c2bdff0b5cb3bb
http://www.fishing-forum.com/rec.out...hits_3279.html
http://www.mombu.com/fishing/fishing...7-1203046.html
http://www.fishingtalk.info/fly-fish...-t6119-10.html
http://www.borgclan.com/forums/f39/2...ain-again.html
http://fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=31755

Those are the first few that come up with your ingenious alias. It's
time for you to move on. The only reason
I removed them from my site was not because of the threats, but
because I'm not looking to host a "Wild West" saloon
style message board.

I believe you're the one who offered to pony up the $100.00 to start
the class action suit. I'll tell yah what... Let's make a deal...
Give me the $100.00, I'll kick you in the balls, spit in your face,
and we'll call it a day.

"Paraleptropy" wrote in message
...

snipped
Dennis, this isn't productive. First, because you, yourself,stated to me
that it was time to let things die, didn't you? Second, the 100-buck offer
came from Asadi,who you haven't a clue about. All in the know here realize
that one was tongue-in-cheek. If you want to open up this can of worms
again, feel free, but it strikes me as ill-advised......
Tom
.....steps back, and waits for the expected response.
--
"The last one, I wont reply to you again, because there is simply no point
in doing so, nor will I post to either of the groups again.

Mike Connor"

8/3/08 7:30 pm EDT

On Aug 6, 12:51*am, Paraleptropy wrote:
Riverman, You truely are an idiot in every sense of the word.

(snip)
I believe you're the one who offered to pony up the $100.00 to start
the class action suit. *I'll tell yah what... Let's make a deal...
Give me the $100.00, I'll kick you in the balls, spit in your face,
and we'll call it a day.- Hide quoted text -

Well, SFB, you have hardly proven beyond a doubt that I'm the idiot.

I'm NOT the guy who offered to pony up $100, neither am I some
foreigner with a marginal use of english 'beyond a few colorful
metafores' (by the way, you meant 'idioms'). In fact, every fact-
based characterization you have made of me and most roffians either
had the facts wrong or had posts attributed to the wrong persons. You
didn't even know what ROFF and ROFFT stand for. Yeah, I'm the idiot
all right. D'uh on me.

I mean, if you can't get simple FACTS straight,spell 'mataphore' in a
sentence accusing someone of having poor English skills, or even
properly attribute posts correctly, I don't really trust your
assertions about such things as who may or may not be an idiot.
Certainly such things as the technological difference between usenet
and web-based groups is way beyond your comprehension. And your
deterioration to simple threats of personal assualt are the perfect
characterization of the New Jersey mentality.

You've done nothing but deflect and mischaracterize, and surprisingly
enough, YOUR idiocy started this whole thing. So enjoy your lunch,
welcome to roff, and I hope you make a few friends while you're here.

--riverman

On Aug 6, 3:56*am, riverman wrote:
spell 'mataphore' in a sentence accusing someone of having poor English skills,


D'oH! I -hate- when I do that.
*thwap*

--riverman