What better symbol of the bull****....

Dave LaCourse wrote:

Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page.

How do you know that?

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:

Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page.

How do you know that?

He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory.

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page.
How do you know that?

He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory.

Again, how do you know that?

JR wrote in :

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page.
How do you know that?

He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory.

Again, how do you know that?


Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory



--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory

You really disappoint me lately, Scott. I thought you were better
than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. I guess going wimpy
and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way.

"Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any
trouble......" Sheeeeeeesh. Gimme a break.

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Yeah. Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory

You really disappoint me lately, Scott. I thought you were better
than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. I guess going wimpy
and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way.

"Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any
trouble......" Sheeeeeeesh. Gimme a break.

Dave




Oh come on, Dave. I thought that was pretty funny, especially with the
little winky thing next to it.

I don't care who's diddling who. I do know that when a congressman gets
caught, the traditional early response is applause from the floor when
the involved party gets caught, unless the act was homosexual. As to
this latest guy, so he's doing to his aide what Bush has been doing to us
all these years.

If the Republicans had roped in the Idiot in Chief, even if just after
the 2006 elections, they'd still be a viable party. They didn't and
we're likely to be stuck with a very powerful Dem party for a decade. I
think this is OK, but I think we'd have a better government if there were
two viable parties.

As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I
don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he
was threatening.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

As to his looniness, its looking like I might need a clearance, and I
don't need trouble from homophobic whack jobs-- at least of the sort he
was threatening. *

Do NOT use a ROFFian as a reference. Been there, done that, took 4+
years to accomplish a 5 year update.
Frank "Hammered in Orlando" Reid
(ever notice how all the plants down here are manicured to within an
inch of their life? Had three guys run after me to clean up after I
did some technicolor decoration on a shrub. Damn, love that free beer
at a convention but don't ride the friggen roller coaster)

On Oct 14, 8:06*pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
Dave LaCourse wrote :



On 14 Oct 2008 22:46:37 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Yeah. *Maybe hypnosis can help you unsuppress the memory

You really disappoint me lately, Scott. *I thought you were better
than the cheap shots you hve been taking lately. *I guess going wimpy
and apologizing to you-know-who makes a man that way.

"Oh, please, don't cause me any trouble, oh please, I don't want any
trouble......" * Sheeeeeeesh. *Gimme a break.

Dave

Oh come on, Dave. *I thought that was pretty funny, especially with the
little winky thing next to it.

I don't care who's diddling who. *I do know that when a congressman gets
caught, the traditional early response is applause from the floor when
the involved party gets caught, unless the act was homosexual. *As to
this latest guy, so he's doing to his aide what Bush has been doing to us
all these years.

But the page *was* under age, wasn't he (she?)? At the very least
he should have been censured.

If the Republicans had roped in the Idiot in Chief, even if just after
the 2006 elections, they'd still be a viable party. *They didn't and
we're likely to be stuck with a very powerful Dem party for a decade. *I
think this is OK, but I think we'd have a better government if there were
two viable parties. *

Yes, a lot better. And speaking of roping in, the Dems should
consider doing that to Ms. Pelosi: that pre-bailout vote speech was
over the top. No, I don't believe that it really affected Rep votes,
but it did show just how deaf Washington pols like her have become.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:41:30 -0400, JR wrote:

Again, how do you know that?

It is in the Congressional report. The page admitted to being drunk.
He was 16. That is forcible as well as statutory rape. Read it.
Google for yourself.

Dave

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:10:44 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0400, JR wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:

Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page.

How do you know that?

He got the page drunk. That is forcible rape. As well as statutory.

Er, no. The page was 17, so age-wise, it was consensual. The alcohol
issue, from a criminal rape standpoint, is iffy at best, and AFAIK, the
page never made such an accusation. That said, it was _significantly_
more improper than what Foley was alleged to have done in that Foley
didn't engage in sexual relations with pages, of consensual age or
otherwise.

HTH,
R

Dave