2008 Presidential election about race?

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rw wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
If you don't like being chastised for posting racist bull****
my suggestion to you would be quit posting racist bull****.
It's quite simple, really.

You're bomb thrower, bless your heart. But calling people racist
when they aren't OBVIOUSLY racist is ****ed up.

Well, in the first place I didn't call the anonymous janitor a
racist, I called his post racist bull****. And if it wasn't
OBVIOUSLY racist bull**** to you, then bless your heart, you're
one of those oblivious types.

Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.


*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

How cool is *that* ?!!? I append that one to every single post !

Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Keep going with the name calling. You're really a piece of work.

Just tell me the name which bugs you the most and I'll be sure to
throw that one in the rotation regularly. You're welcome.

*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

How cool is *that* ?!!? I append that one to every single post !

Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !



Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.

Yeah, "Fortenberry". I can think of no more insulting description.

Go ahead and post. You'll get the last word, but I won't pay any
attention to it. You're obviously not worth the bandwidth. But maybe
you should mention to your shrink that he should up your meds.

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !

Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.

Roger Angell ? Oh, he's just another one of the numerous
Ken Fortenberry wannabes at _The New Yorker_. LOL !!

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:30:37 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !

Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.

Roger Angell ? Oh, he's just another one of the numerous
Ken Fortenberry wannabes at _The New Yorker_. LOL !!

FWIW, various members of the Alexis family and my family are friends,
and I know neither of you know of that which you claim to speak...I
would guess that Lucky would have voted McCain, and I can just about
guarantee - to the point, ala John McLaughlin, of a metaphysical
certainty - that at least two of his children did.

HTH,
R

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !
Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.
Roger Angell ? Oh, he's just another one of the numerous
Ken Fortenberry wannabes at _The New Yorker_. LOL !!

FWIW, various members of the Alexis family and my family are friends,
and I know neither of you know of that which you claim to speak...

A friend of my cousin's girlfriend once had a flat tire right
outside of El Paso, Texas so I know you're just plain full of it.

Sheesh.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:12:16 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Here's something you might want to chew on:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/1...ta_talk_angell

Enjoy !
Whatever. The article didn't even mention John Crowley. But then you
don't really know about what you speak anyway. And neither did the
author. Is he just another Fortenberry or does he have credibility.
Roger Angell ? Oh, he's just another one of the numerous
Ken Fortenberry wannabes at _The New Yorker_. LOL !!

FWIW, various members of the Alexis family and my family are friends,
and I know neither of you know of that which you claim to speak...

A friend of my cousin's girlfriend once had a flat tire right
outside of El Paso, Texas so I know you're just plain full of it.

Sheesh.

Uh-huh...lessee here...well, for starters, Lurita Doan is Lucien/Lucky
Alexis' daughter...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

SNICKER
R

Peaceful Bill wrote:


*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.


Heh heh, I´ll second that. Nevertheless, over a very long period of
time I have come to realise that there is basically nothing sensible to
be done other than ignore him. No matter what you write, sense or logic
will do you no good at all, he will just keep on hammering at you for
something or other. He has a talent for inciting people, probably his
only talent, and there are some here who would support him.

Just ignore the asshole. Nobody will think ill of you as a result, and
when he is obliged to spew his paranoid rants without anybody replying,
it just makes him look more of a loony.

Of course, these things are a matter of individual choice.

Neveretheless, I wish I had come to such a conclusion, and implemented
it, a long long time ago.

TL
MC

On 15-Nov-2008, " wrote:

Nevertheless, over a very long period of
time I have come to realise that there is basically nothing sensible to
be done other than ignore him

I wish I had come to such a conclusion, and implemented
it, a long long time ago
====================

Quit you f'in whining and crying and listen to your own advice - Fool!
Its never too late!


Tonto

wrote:
Peaceful Bill wrote:
*Fortenberry.* Its the worst possible thing I can think of.

Heh heh, I´ll second that. ...

"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one:
O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it."

- Francois Marie Arouet Voltaire

--
Ken Fortenberry