![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message 200909281331238930-dplacourse@aolcom, David LaCourse
writes Bruce said that we should blow out all the air as we rose to the surface. He didn't say why. It wasn't until years later that I realized how dangerous this "diving bell" was. Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Air embolisms are nasty things. -- Bill Grey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey said:
Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day in Back Lake. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David LaCourse wrote:
On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey said: Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day in Back Lake. Dave You wouldn't have had to worry about the bends (nitrogen narcosis) at that depth. What you should have worried about was the buildup of a toxic concentration of carbon dioxide in the diving bell. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 28, 3:48*pm, rw wrote:
David LaCourse wrote: On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey said: Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. *The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! *Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day in Back Lake. Dave You wouldn't have had to worry about the bends (nitrogen narcosis) at that depth. What you should have worried about was the buildup of a toxic concentration of carbon dioxide in the diving bell. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? I don't know anything about it, I was just curious after reading Dave's very interesting story . . . Air embolism - a condition resulting from excess pressure in the lungs- is probably the second most common cause of scuba fatalities. When a man loses his air supply under water, he has an overwhelming instinct to hold his breath and surface immediately. The lack of adequate exhalation during ascent in panic creates excessive pressure in the lungs. This condition has produced air embolism in less than 15 feet of water. Increased lung pressure may also occur in a normal ascent if the diver fails to breathe continuously. nitrogen narcosis n. A condition of confusion or stupor resulting from increased levels of dissolved nitrogen in the blood, as that occurring in deep-sea divers breathing air under high pressure. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, mr.rapidan writes Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? Yes indeed! -- Bill Grey |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Bill Grey
writes In message , mr.rapidan writes Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? Yes indeed! Nitrogen Narcosis: see:- http://www.answers.com/topic/nitroge...s-and-symptoms The bends see:- http://scuba-diving.suite101.com/art...n_scuba_diving Air embolism see:- http://scuba-diving.suite101.com/art...ba_dive_ascent -- Bill Grey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-28 16:29:56 -0400, "mr.rapidan" said:
On Sep 28, 3:48*pm, rw wrote: David LaCourse wrote: On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey sa id: Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. *The trick would have been to surface no faste r than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! *Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day in Back Lake. Dave You wouldn't have had to worry about the bends (nitrogen narcosis) at that depth. What you should have worried about was the buildup of a toxic concentration of carbon dioxide in the diving bell. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? I don't know anything about it, I was just curious after reading Dave's very interesting story . . . Air embolism - a condition resulting from excess pressure in the lungs- is probably the second most common cause of scuba fatalities. When a man loses his air supply under water, he has an overwhelming instinct to hold his breath and surface immediately. The lack of adequate exhalation during ascent in panic creates excessive pressure in the lungs. This condition has produced air embolism in less than 15 feet of water. Increased lung pressure may also occur in a normal ascent if the diver fails to breathe continuously. nitrogen narcosis n. A condition of confusion or stupor resulting from increased levels of dissolved nitrogen in the blood, as that occurring in deep-sea divers breathing air under high pressure. Yeah, it's called busting a lung and it could happen in water of 12 or so feet. We were told to make sure we exhaled while coming up from 10 feet in a swimming pool while undergoing training. It would have been very easy to surface with that lung full of air without releasing some of it. Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 28, 4:00*pm, David LaCourse wrote:
On 2009-09-28 16:29:56 -0400, "mr.rapidan" said: On Sep 28, 3:48*pm, rw wrote: David LaCourse wrote: On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey sa id: Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. *The trick would have been to surface no faste r than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! *Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day *in Back Lake. Dave You wouldn't have had to worry about the bends (nitrogen narcosis) at that depth. What you should have worried about was the buildup of a toxic concentration of carbon dioxide in the diving bell. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? I don't know anything about it, I was just curious after reading Dave's very interesting story . . . Air embolism - a condition resulting from excess pressure in the lungs- is probably the second most common cause of scuba fatalities. When a man loses his air supply under water, he has an overwhelming instinct to hold his breath and surface immediately. The lack of adequate exhalation during ascent in panic creates excessive pressure in the lungs. This condition has produced air embolism in less than 15 feet of water. Increased lung pressure may also occur in a normal ascent if the diver fails to breathe continuously. nitrogen narcosis n. *A condition of confusion or stupor resulting from increased levels of dissolved nitrogen in the blood, as that occurring in deep-sea divers breathing air under high pressure. Yeah, it's called busting a lung and it could happen in water of 12 or so feet. *We were told to make sure we exhaled while coming up from 10 feet in a swimming pool while undergoing training. Yeah, and meteor could penetrate your head.....and evidently has. It would have been very easy to surface with that lung full of air without releasing some of it. It is easy. I've done it hundreds of times. g. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 28, 3:29*pm, "mr.rapidan" wrote:
On Sep 28, 3:48*pm, rw wrote: David LaCourse wrote: On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey said: Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. *The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Correct! *Years later when I got my NAUI ticket I thought of that day in Back Lake. Dave You wouldn't have had to worry about the bends (nitrogen narcosis) at that depth. What you should have worried about was the buildup of a toxic concentration of carbon dioxide in the diving bell. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. Isn't an air embolism different than nitrogen narcosis? I don't know anything about it, I was just curious after reading Dave's very interesting story . . . Air embolism - a condition resulting from excess pressure in the lungs- is probably the second most common cause of scuba fatalities. When a man loses his air supply under water, he has an overwhelming instinct to hold his breath and surface immediately. The lack of adequate exhalation during ascent in panic creates excessive pressure in the lungs. This condition has produced air embolism in less than 15 feet of water. Increased lung pressure may also occur in a normal ascent if the diver fails to breathe continuously. nitrogen narcosis n. *A condition of confusion or stupor resulting from increased levels of dissolved nitrogen in the blood, as that occurring in deep-sea divers breathing air under high pressure Interesting set of observations from someone who doesn't know anything about it. g. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-28 14:31:30 -0400, Bill Grey said:
Yes indeed a simple mistake for the uninitiated but with possible long lasting consequences. *The trick would have been to surface no faster than your bubbles assuming you were breathing out. Reminds me of my one day in "The Tower" in Groton, CT. Those of you who've watched the show(s) about Navy Sub School know exactly what I'm talking about. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will the hare lose the race? | theartoflee[_2_] | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | August 16th, 2007 08:53 PM |
Cabin fever at it's worst? | Jeff Taylor | Fly Fishing | 3 | December 16th, 2003 01:41 AM |
Yankees Lose | George Adams | Fly Fishing | 4 | November 4th, 2003 03:27 AM |
OT Cubs Lose | George Cleveland | Fly Fishing | 5 | October 16th, 2003 07:08 PM |