Blue Ribbon Coalition member arrested in Yellowstone National Park

(Rick Clemons) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Jack W Clarkson) wrote:

(Sportsmen Against Bush) wrote in message
. com...
Yellowstone National Park (ID,MT,WY)
Poacher Arrested Following Stand-Off
Snip

snip

The answer to your question is: Of course not!

I do not have to find out anything. There is nothing in the article
that
would indicate that the perpertrator is anything but a thoughtless and
reckless
individual. No tie in the BRC is mentioned in the article. Yor
response to my post is interesting.

You seem to be educated beyond your intelligence.

Jack

In article ,
(Jack W Clarkson) wrote:


The answer to your question is: Of course not!

I asked several questions. Do you say no to all of them?

I do not have to find out anything. There is nothing in the article
that
would indicate that the perpertrator is anything but a thoughtless and
reckless
individual. No tie in the BRC is mentioned in the article. Yor
response to my post is interesting.

Because the article did not mention an affiliation with the BRC, does not
mean that Johnson is not a member. The person who posted may have
knowledge of the affiliation, but I do not claim to know. Again, instead
of threatening people, and now insulting them, why don't you find out who
this guy is? Of course, you are right, because you do not have to find
out anything. But, if you want to argue with the person who posted the
original message, you might want to obtain some evidence.

You seem to be educated beyond your intelligence.

Hey Jack, what the hell does that mean?

--
Rick Clemons

This is my email address, not a sign that I represent the university in any official capacity.

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:34:28 -0600, (Rick Clemons)
wrote:

if you want to argue with the person who posted the
original message, you might want to obtain some evidence.


Not on the 'Net. The convention on the 'Net, as in many real life
areas, is that the person making a statement is the one who has to
provide the evidence. If I post that 2 + 2 = 5, it's not up to my
critics to provide evidence that I am incorrect. They can merely
state it to be contrary to general arithmetic. It is up to me to do
the proof of my statement. If I can't quickly pop up with a different
brand of math, _and_ apologize for not having mentioned it in my
original post, that proves 2 + 2 = 5, I'd best just slink off quietly
into the darkest corner of trolldom.
--

rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing.
Often taunted by trout.
Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli