A Plea for Sanity

Ken states:
Tom Littleton threatens again:

sorry you feel threatened.

Semantics, my ass, you sanctimonious little prick, and I'd
be more than happy to say that in your face if I'm ever so
unfortunate as to cross paths with you.

ho-hum!
Tom

Tom Littleton wrote:

sorry you feel threatened.

Are you now ? That would make you a liar and a hypocrite.

Well, that went about as well as a Pollyanna plea could be
expected to go. Let that be a lesson to all of us.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken writes:
sorry you feel threatened.

Are you now ? That would make you a liar and a hypocrite.

where did I threaten you? Trust me,chum, if you are trying to read between the
lines and get a threat out of it, you don't have a clue about me. Not that I
would be surprised over that, but.....If I wanted to threaten you, it would be
dead obvious, trust me.
Well, that went about as well as a Pollyanna plea could be
expected to go. Let that be a lesson to all of us.

as noted, you seemed to be the only one who stated any offense, so I figure
that bodes well. It seems, Ken, that you want to see things in Black and White,
Good and Evil, Friend and Foe. Kinda like our Commander in Chief, with
different politics.
That sort of stuff is a little shallow for my tastes, most of the time. I do
agree that a lesson might be learned by all, but not in the sense you see it.
Tom

Tom Littleton wrote:

... Trust me,chum, if you are trying to read between the
lines and get a threat out of it, you don't have a clue about me. Not that I
would be surprised over that, but.....If I wanted to threaten you, it would be
dead obvious, trust me.

I have more than a clue about you, "chum", I know you way better
than you'd like to think. I choose my words carefully and when I
refer to you as a sanctimonious little prick I do so as an astute
and experienced observer of Usenet personae.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. BTW, if you are gleaning your info from USENET,
your sources are a bit lacking, dontcha think?
EOT, at least insofar as wallowing with you is concerned.
Tom

Tom Littleton wrote:

Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. ...

================================================== ==============================
p.s. I always liked the sporting bar analogy
of ROFF, but in a real bar, one can enjoy
watching people getting tossed after making nuisances of themselves....or,
getting their asses kicked.


I feel you are a perfect example of the kind of Usenet participant who talks
one way online, and hasn't the balls to do the same in person. I would be more
than happy to say so to your face, should I encounter you.
================================================== ==============================

Big bad Usenet talk, you sound like the putz.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 00:23:06 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Big bad Usenet talk,

Yet another irony meter shot to ****.
--
Charlie...

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
om...

Big bad Usenet talk, you sound like the putz.

And he will, doubtless, be dealt with in the same manner.

Wolfgang
REMEMBER YELLOWSTONE!

"Tom Littleton" wrote in message
...
Ken blathers on:

point out the threat, Ken. I just don't like someone claiming I threatened
them, when I clearly did not. BTW, if you are gleaning your info from
USENET,
your sources are a bit lacking, dontcha think?
EOT, at least insofar as wallowing with you is concerned.
Tom

"eot"...ah, a phrase to be valued, and to be seen more often, in a
better time. fewer friendships would be lost, and thereby less loss to life
itself.

wayno