A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

first day with orvis waders



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 7th, 2004, 03:46 AM
Steve Sullivan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default first day with orvis waders

In article ,
daytripper wrote:

It just dawned on me that perhaps Mr. Sullivan's waders have the knee patches
sewn on up-side-down, so that the "v" notch is above the knee instead of
below.

If that's the case, I can see how they could fill up and retain water out of
the stream, which might even rise to the level of "aggravating"...

/daytripper (...and if it is the case, take 'em back for a replacement...)


Nope, the slit is on the bottom of the patch. The problem is the space
gets completely filled with water, which adds a considerable ammount of
weight, and being in the water for several hours having to wade around
with it is kind of a pain. I will probably just send them back and get
the pro guides, which I have been told dont retain water.
  #2  
Old May 7th, 2004, 04:22 AM
daytripper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default first day with orvis waders

On Fri, 07 May 2004 02:46:52 GMT, Steve Sullivan wrote:

In article ,
daytripper wrote:

It just dawned on me that perhaps Mr. Sullivan's waders have the knee patches
sewn on up-side-down, so that the "v" notch is above the knee instead of
below.

If that's the case, I can see how they could fill up and retain water out of
the stream, which might even rise to the level of "aggravating"...

/daytripper (...and if it is the case, take 'em back for a replacement...)


Nope, the slit is on the bottom of the patch. The problem is the space
gets completely filled with water, which adds a considerable ammount of
weight, and being in the water for several hours having to wade around
with it is kind of a pain.


Interesting. For the years I've been using them, I've never noticed this as
being an issue, but perhaps I'm not the most sensitive guy around ;-)

I will probably just send them back and get the pro guides, which
I have been told dont retain water.


Let us know how you make out with them if you do...

/daytripper
  #3  
Old May 7th, 2004, 02:09 PM
Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default first day with orvis waders

I just tried the Pro Guide 2 stocking foot waders on the water, as an
upgrade from Silver Label lace-up boot foots I have used for years. General
observations:

My Silver Labels (old style, not SL2's) also have the knee patch that fills
with water - annoying at first, but no big deal in the long run. I was told
by someone at Orvis that the knee patch provides the extra durability of 5
layer breathable fabric, without the cost. The Silver Label lace-up boot
foot waders were extremely uncomfortable on my feet to the point that I
could hardly walk at the end of the day (I have extremely flat feet, and
this may be the cause). Mine are also rather baggy, (something they say they
have corrected on the new SL2's), but that works well when layering up for
Steelhead fishing.

The Pro Guide 2's are great. The bagginess is gone, the handwarmer pocket is
very nice, the ergonomically shaped booties fit very nicely, two wading belt
pockets, no sewn-on knee patch, very handy suspender latches, and a handy
tippet spool pouch. The material seems heavier to me than the Silver Label
material, but it could just be the newness. Overall, I am very pleased.

HTH,

Jim Ray

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2004 02:46:52 GMT, Steve Sullivan wrote:

In article ,
daytripper wrote:

It just dawned on me that perhaps Mr. Sullivan's waders have the knee

patches
sewn on up-side-down, so that the "v" notch is above the knee instead

of
below.

If that's the case, I can see how they could fill up and retain water

out of
the stream, which might even rise to the level of "aggravating"...

/daytripper (...and if it is the case, take 'em back for a

replacement...)

Nope, the slit is on the bottom of the patch. The problem is the space
gets completely filled with water, which adds a considerable ammount of
weight, and being in the water for several hours having to wade around
with it is kind of a pain.


Interesting. For the years I've been using them, I've never noticed this

as
being an issue, but perhaps I'm not the most sensitive guy around ;-)

I will probably just send them back and get the pro guides, which
I have been told dont retain water.


Let us know how you make out with them if you do...

/daytripper



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
waders rant Steve Sullivan General Discussion 50 January 6th, 2005 10:27 PM
waders rant Steve Sullivan Fly Fishing 66 January 6th, 2005 10:27 PM
Orvis + Wal-Mart = Angry local shopkeep Tom Gibson Fly Fishing 156 April 28th, 2004 11:31 AM
WARNING!! Avoid TIE-FAST and ADG!! Steve Sullivan Fly Fishing 21 April 8th, 2004 07:20 PM
WARNING!! Avoid TIE-FAST and ADG!! Steve Sullivan General Discussion 18 April 7th, 2004 03:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.