![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Charles" wrote in message
... It's the problem when mean is used to produce an index like this. Not claiming to be an expert on contributions and giving but I've been taking a crash course in it so I can help lead a $2.5 million fund drive to help rebuild a small community hospital in sothern Michigan. There are some key items in this brief report which I think should be disclosed before taking it as anything other than a computed index of giving based largely upon a sample of tax returns. 1. Data comes from the IRS charitable deduction totals. Short form filers who give but not enough to meet the standard deduction would not be included in the data... and 2. As it has been noted, the states have a higher portion of church attendees with a mindset of giving to their church. The charitable contributions in the IRS line would lump United Way and Cancer Society donations with tithes to the local First Baptist Church since donations qualify as a charitable donation. The United Way hits the news when it starts spending 25% or more on overhead, it is not uncommon for churches to use most of their contributions to operate the church and a much smaller percentage ends up go to mission and outreach. I've seen it as small as 3%. and lastly 3. Another commonality to many of the blue states is they have higher property and income taxes than do the southern states, not to debate the relative merits/non merits of the situation, but that does impact the amount left for contributions. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Wayne Knight"
The United Way hits the news when it starts spending 25% or more on overhead, it is not uncommon for churches to use most of their contributions to operate the church and a much smaller percentage ends up go to mission and outreach. Well, I know this is a stupid question, but how would the churches operate, if not for the donations from the members? My wife and I belong to a small church which barely gets by, and is supported mainly by membership dues and donations. They do some missionary and outreach work, and that is supported by fundraising events. George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Adams" wrote in message ... Well, I know this is a stupid question, but how would the churches operate, if not for the donations from the members? My wife and I belong to a small church which barely gets by, and is supported mainly by membership dues and donations. They do some missionary and outreach work, and that is supported by fundraising events. It's not a stupid question and a valid point to the argument Dave put out. My only point is that both the United Way and the Local Church are charities for the purpose of deductions under the IRS code but have different standards of how the money is used. The same could be said for the boy and girl scout programs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George writes:
Well, I know this is a stupid question, but how would the churches operate, if not for the donations from the members? My wife and I belong to a small church which barely gets by, and is supported mainly by membership dues and donations. They do some missionary and outreach work, and that is supported by fundraising events. There are a couple of churches nearby that feed senior citizens every Thursday. The money to do it comes from volunteers and money from the church itself. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov 2004 03:30:18 GMT, irate (Dave LaCourse)
wrote: George writes: Well, I know this is a stupid question, but how would the churches operate, if not for the donations from the members? My wife and I belong to a small church which barely gets by, and is supported mainly by membership dues and donations. They do some missionary and outreach work, and that is supported by fundraising events. There are a couple of churches nearby that feed senior citizens every Thursday. The money to do it comes from volunteers and money from the church itself. Undoubtably Church attendance skews the survey. And while churches also undoubtably do do good works, most of the money goes towards servicing the congregations. In other words the charitibale giving ends up directly benefitting the givers. Here is a link to a site that gives the percentage of the indivuidual state's populations who attend church services. http://www.theamericanchurch.org/states.htm You'll notice that almost twice as many Mississippians attend as opposed to Massachussians (or what ever they call themselves). So for Massachussetts, and the other NE states with similiar attendance numbers, to be low on the charitability scale is only logical. On the other hand my home state of Wisconsin has almost as many church goers as Mississippi and yet its near the bottom. I would have thought our numbers would have been higher considering the horror stories I've heard of the Lutheran Mafia visiting peoples' houses and telling them that their giving has been too meager and that they should either shell out or get out. There are 3x more Evagelicals in MS than in WI though, which perhaps translates into more giving. Plus, are tuitions to religious schools tax deductible? I imagine that there are far more kids enrolled in "Christian Academies" in MS than in WI. g.c. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: George Cleveland
Massachussians (or what ever they call themselves) "Taxans" g George Adams "All good fishermen stay young until they die, for fishing is the only dream of youth that doth not grow stale with age." ---- J.W Muller |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:05:23 -0600, George Cleveland
wrote: (snipped) Plus, are tuitions to religious schools tax deductible? I imagine that there are far more kids enrolled in "Christian Academies" in MS than in WI. IIRC, no religious schooling isn't tax deductible. Or wasn't, last I heard / read. However there are some sorts of tradeoffs. Up in MN, the schools are heavily subsidized by the church (for Catholic ones. I lived in a not too rich Catholic neighborhood for many years). Many people whose kids couldn't in any way afford a private school sent their kids to church school. I think a lot of it is bookkeeping. So the church schools come out of the 'charitable donation' in some ways, but not directly. The voucher scheme would have been a big help _to the church_ there. Donations would remain constant, but expenses would drop like a rock. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:50:32 -0600, Cyli
wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:05:23 -0600, George Cleveland wrote: (snipped) Plus, are tuitions to religious schools tax deductible? I imagine that there are far more kids enrolled in "Christian Academies" in MS than in WI. IIRC, no religious schooling isn't tax deductible. Or wasn't, last I heard / read. However there are some sorts of tradeoffs. Up in MN, the schools are heavily subsidized by the church (for Catholic ones. I lived in a not too rich Catholic neighborhood for many years). Many people whose kids couldn't in any way afford a private school sent their kids to church school. I think a lot of it is bookkeeping. So the church schools come out of the 'charitable donation' in some ways, but not directly. The voucher scheme would have been a big help _to the church_ there. Donations would remain constant, but expenses would drop like a rock. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) Yep, I checked up on it too. Tuition is not a charitable deduction, although you can set aside a tax free tuition account to pay for it. But any other donation that would be made to the school, as long as it was not in lieu of tuition, would be deductible. g.c. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:50:32 -0600, Cyli
wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:05:23 -0600, George Cleveland wrote: (snipped) Plus, are tuitions to religious schools tax deductible? I imagine that there are far more kids enrolled in "Christian Academies" in MS than in WI. IIRC, no religious schooling isn't tax deductible. Or wasn't, last I heard / read. However there are some sorts of tradeoffs. Up in MN, the schools are heavily subsidized by the church (for Catholic ones. I lived in a not too rich Catholic neighborhood for many years). Many people whose kids couldn't in any way afford a private school sent their kids to church school. I think a lot of it is bookkeeping. So the church schools come out of the 'charitable donation' in some ways, but not directly. The voucher scheme would have been a big help _to the church_ there. Donations would remain constant, but expenses would drop like a rock. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) Yep, I checked up on it too. Tuition is not a charitable deduction, although you can set aside a tax free tuition account to pay for it. But any other donation that would be made to the school, as long as it was not in lieu of tuition, would be deductible. g.c. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:50:32 -0600, Cyli
wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:05:23 -0600, George Cleveland wrote: (snipped) Plus, are tuitions to religious schools tax deductible? I imagine that there are far more kids enrolled in "Christian Academies" in MS than in WI. IIRC, no religious schooling isn't tax deductible. Or wasn't, last I heard / read. However there are some sorts of tradeoffs. Up in MN, the schools are heavily subsidized by the church (for Catholic ones. I lived in a not too rich Catholic neighborhood for many years). Many people whose kids couldn't in any way afford a private school sent their kids to church school. I think a lot of it is bookkeeping. So the church schools come out of the 'charitable donation' in some ways, but not directly. The voucher scheme would have been a big help _to the church_ there. Donations would remain constant, but expenses would drop like a rock. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) Yep, I checked up on it too. Tuition is not a charitable deduction, although you can set aside a tax free tuition account to pay for it. But any other donation that would be made to the school, as long as it was not in lieu of tuition, would be deductible. g.c. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stanley, Idaho Presidential election results | rw | Fly Fishing | 34 | November 13th, 2004 06:53 AM |
OT -- very thoughtful, imho | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 85 | November 10th, 2004 08:09 PM |
The Electoral system | rw | Fly Fishing | 144 | November 10th, 2004 03:44 PM |
todays election chuckle | Wayne Knight | Fly Fishing | 0 | October 20th, 2004 02:59 AM |
Qld Election - Fishing Regulations | Justin Thyme | Fishing in Australia | 4 | February 8th, 2004 07:02 AM |