Salmon and Dams

Found this posted on another forum.

http://tinyurl.com/667xu

JT

Jeff Taylor wrote:
Found this posted on another forum.

http://tinyurl.com/667xu

It's a good article, but Babbitt for some reason leaves out the most
entertainingly ridiculous aspect of the administration's new plan: the
determination that the Snake River dams can't be breached because they
now constitute a "natural" part of the river system.

JR

"Gene Cottrell" wrote in message
...
.....At
least the president's administration is attempting to help the problem...

Yeah, well, that's the problem, ainna?

Um.....and then there's you, of course.

Wolfgang
who is quite certain that he will never understand how so many illiterates
find their way here.

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:36:38 -0800, "Jeff Taylor" wrote:

Found this posted on another forum.

http://tinyurl.com/667xu

And people wonder why I refuse to bend to the will of the current regime...

/daytripper (Traitors. All of them...)

Gene Cottrell wrote:

What was that a-hole Babbitt and the Clinton administration doing for 8
years?

dammit man...a proper blow job reqires intelligent cultivation. 8 years
is pure genius. god, i miss bill and "babbitt". sex is so much more
pleasant than murder, don't ya think?

If he was so interested in the Snake River, the dams would have been
gone long before Bush go into office. Just another Bush bashing idiot!

oxymoron...or ...

At
least the president's administration is attempting to help the problem
instead of blaming others for their short sightedness.

so true...i mean, after all, who could they blame? maybe i'm a bit
pixillated, but helping people die isn't really a visionary's work, is it?

"Jeff Miller" wrote in message
news:yu1Dd.68640$Jk5.35947@lakeread01...
SNIP
so true...i mean, after all, who could they blame? maybe i'm a bit
pixillated, but helping people die isn't really a visionary's work, is it?


Rather depends on the dedication involved. You can do anything when God´s on
your side. ( You just need the right God, and a lot of money and power).

TL
MC

gary wrote:
Has anyone ever noticed that we need electricy?

Hmmmmm. . . I think I'm noticing that right now. You?
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

gary wrote:
I think the dams and transportation for the famers is in the long run way
more inportant than any fish.
Has anyone ever noticed that we need electricy?

I've noticed even with electricity it's possible to end up an
ill-educated boob.

JR wrote:
gary wrote:
I think the dams and transportation for the famers is in the long
run way more inportant than any fish.
Has anyone ever noticed that we need electricy?

I've noticed even with electricity it's possible to end up an
ill-educated boob.

Now THAT just depends on the voltage and how tightly they're strapped to
the chair.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

"Tim J." wrote in message
...
JR wrote:
gary wrote:
I think the dams and transportation for the famers is in the long
run way more inportant than any fish.
Has anyone ever noticed that we need electricy?

I've noticed even with electricity it's possible to end up an
ill-educated boob.

Now THAT just depends on the voltage and how tightly they're strapped to
the chair.

Shocking treatment, I say.

--riverman
(who is always up for remedial education of a boob or two...)