A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Bass Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Evinrude vs Mercury



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th, 2004, 06:06 AM
Bob La Londe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com




  #2  
Old October 31st, 2004, 01:57 AM
go-bassn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com






  #3  
Old October 31st, 2004, 03:01 AM
Bob La Londe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing

it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was

a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I

am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com








  #4  
Old October 31st, 2004, 04:13 AM
go-bassn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

It's amazing Bob, the fuel & oil economy alone make it a great buy. I hear
a 250 is in the works...

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me
strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing

it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line
that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was

a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I

am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com










  #5  
Old October 31st, 2004, 03:23 PM
Bob Rickard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

Maybe there is hope that things do actually change for the better.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
It's amazing Bob, the fuel & oil economy alone make it a great buy. I

hear
a 250 is in the works...

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me
strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few

years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been

doing
it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line
that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both

introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude

was
a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit

I
am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more

contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com












  #6  
Old October 31st, 2004, 03:23 PM
Bob Rickard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

Maybe there is hope that things do actually change for the better.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
It's amazing Bob, the fuel & oil economy alone make it a great buy. I

hear
a 250 is in the works...

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me
strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few

years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been

doing
it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line
that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both

introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude

was
a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit

I
am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more

contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com












  #7  
Old October 31st, 2004, 04:13 AM
go-bassn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

It's amazing Bob, the fuel & oil economy alone make it a great buy. I hear
a 250 is in the works...

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me
strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing

it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line
that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was

a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I

am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com










  #8  
Old October 31st, 2004, 05:31 PM
P B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury


I presently own 3 Merc's!
Never have had one problem in many years of service"go-bassn"
wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me

strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing

it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line

that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was

a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I

am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Attached Images
File Type: gif p.gif (940 Bytes, 282 views)
  #9  
Old October 31st, 2004, 03:01 AM
Bob La Londe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

I have been looking at exactly that motor for my next boat. Glad to hear
it.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"go-bassn" wrote in message
...
Bob, my '04 225 HO Evinrude has been amazing all year, not a single

problem

--
Warren

http://www.warrenwolk.com
Http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com
2004 NJ B.A.S.S. Federation State Champions

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I

had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their
Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing

it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were
talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the

year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct

injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing
the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was

a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the

way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I

am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary
than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com








  #10  
Old October 30th, 2004, 03:28 PM
Bob Rickard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evinrude vs Mercury

I have no specifics, but I believe that it is safe to say that both Evinrude
and Mercury have contributed equally toward the great success of Yamaha.

--
Bob Rickard
(AKA Dr. Spinnerbait)
www.secretweaponlures.com
--------------------------=x O')))


"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
...
I recently had a local boat dealer and Evinrude enthusiast give me strong
lecture on the virtues of how Evinrude had done the super clean high
performance direct injection thing first with their FICHT engines. I had
commented on the number of Evinrudes that had blown up for a few years.

His comment was that Mercury was having the same problem with their

Optimax
that Evinrude had with their FICHT engines, but Evinrude had been doing it
longer and they were over their problems with the new technology.

I was just reading an article in a 1998 Bassin' magazine. They were

talking
about how Mercury had added some new HP sizes to their Optimax line that
year, and that FICHT engines had started showing up on bass rigs the year
before.

So exactly how much longer has Evinrude been playing with direct injection
technology. That article makes it seem like they were both introducing

the
technology to the market at nearly the same time. Even if Evinrude was a
year ahead that was 6-7 years ago. Its always interesting to see the way
people's passions can color their memory and/or view point. (I admit I am
not immune from this.)

Now of course my serious interest in this subject is more contemporary

than
that, but I found the comments, and the article very interesting.


--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercury force Sam Bass Fishing 5 June 26th, 2004 11:38 PM
horrible experience with mercury outboard - advice needed! J.P. Bass Fishing 5 May 18th, 2004 08:32 PM
Mercury 110 9.8hp Ted General Discussion 0 May 4th, 2004 03:27 PM
Evinrude outboards DRossCanton Bass Fishing 1 April 15th, 2004 11:18 AM
Merry Christmas! Bush camp weakens mercury protections! Ho Ho Ho! Sportsmen Against Bush Fly Fishing 0 December 5th, 2003 07:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.