Upside down dryfly revisited

On 25 Feb 2007 19:04:55 -0800, "salmobytes"
wrote:

On Feb 25, 11:02 am, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Reposting the entire post to which you're responding only to add
one line.

What I posted never before appeared on usenet.

Ken was complaining to the person who quoted your post and only added
one line, not to or about you.

Notice the attributions.
--

r.bc: vixen
Minnow goddess, Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher.
Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

On Feb 26, 1:53 am, Cyli wrote:

Ken was complaining to the person who quoted your post and only added
one line, not to or about you.

.....it's a great and terrible usenet. Sorry Ken. I got it wrong

On Feb 26, 8:30 am, "salmobytes" wrote:
On Feb 26, 1:53 am, Cyli wrote:

Ken was complaining to the person who quoted your post and only added
one line, not to or about you.

I've been using Google's Ajax-empowered news reader, because, well,
that's what I use.
I do like most things Google, but the new (just out of beta) Google
newsreader
does make it hard to figure who posted what, and which part of a
thread
you are currently reading. I might have to find another reader.

On Feb 26, 4:38 pm, "salmobytes" wrote:
On Feb 26, 8:30 am, "salmobytes" wrote:

On Feb 26, 1:53 am, Cyli wrote:

Ken was complaining to the person who quoted your post and only added
one line, not to or about you.

I've been using Google's Ajax-empowered news reader, because, well,
that's what I use.
I do like most things Google, but the new (just out of beta) Google
newsreader
does make it hard to figure who posted what, and which part of a
thread
you are currently reading. I might have to find another reader.

The google groups interface is also somewhat involved, ( or is that
the one you mean?). Difficult to see exactly what is what, and it is
slow.

Not Homophiliac-proof either.

TL
MC